Home > Journals > Minerva Anesthesiology > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 August;81(8) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 August;81(8):855-64



To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian


Cite this article as



Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 August;81(8):855-64


language: English

Esophageal pressure measurements under different conditions of intrathoracic pressure. An in vitro study of second generation balloon catheters

Mojoli F. 1, Chiumello D. 2, Pozzi M. 1, Algieri I. 3, Bianzina S. 1, Luoni S. 3, Volta C. A. 4, Braschi A. 1, Brochard L. 5

1 Sezione di Anestesia Rianimazione e Terapia Antalgica, Dipartimento di Scienze Clinico-chirurgiche, Diagnostiche e Pediatriche, SC Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy; 2 Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione (Intensiva e Subintensiva) e Terapia del Dolore, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; 3 Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy; 4 Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologiche, Medicina Sperimentale e Chirurgia, Sezione di Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva, Università di Ferrara, Arcispedale Sant’ Anna, Ferrara, Italy; 5 Keenan Research Centre and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Critical Care Department, University of Toronto, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada


BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the accuracy of second generation esophageal catheters at different surrounding pressures and filling volumes and to suggest appropriate catheter management in clinical practice.
METHODS: Six different esophageal catheters were placed in an experimental chamber at four chamber pressures (0, 10, 20 and 30 cmH2O) and at filling volumes ranging from 0 to 10 mL. The working volume was defined as the volume range between the maximum (Vmax) and minimum (Vmin) volumes achieving acceptable accuracy (defined by a balloon transmural pressure ±1 cmH2O). Accuracy was evaluated for a standard volume of 0.5 mL and for volumes recommended by manufacturers. Data are shown as median and interquartile range.
RESULTS: In the four conditions of chamber pressure Vmin, Vmax and working volume were 1.0 (0.5, 1.5), 5.3 (3.8, 7.1), and 3.5 (2.9, 6.1) mL. Increasing chamber pressure increased Vmin (rho=0.9; P<0.0001), that reached 2.0 mL (1.6-2.0) at 30 cmH2O. Vmax and working volumes differed among catheters, whereas Vmin did not. By injecting 0.5 mL and the minimum recommended volume by manufacturer, balloon transmural pressure was <-1 cmH2O in 71% and 53% of cases, it was negatively related to chamber pressure (rho=-0.97 and -0.71; P<0.0001) and reached values of -10.4 (-12.4, -9.7) and -9.8 (-10.6, -3.4) at 30 cmH2O.
CONCLUSION: Measuring positive esophageal pressures needs higher injected volumes than usually recommended. The range of appropriate filling volumes is catheter-specific. Both absolute values and respiratory changes of esophageal pressure can be underestimated by an underfilled balloon.

top of page