Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 Aug 02

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 Aug 02

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15595-6

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Comparison of renal replacement therapy and renal recovery before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A single centre observational study

Rebecca RYAN 1, Isabel TAYLOR 1, Chris LAING 2, Mervyn SINGER 1, 3, Dereck GONDONGWE 1, Niall MacCALLUM 1, Nishkantha ARULKUMARAN 1, 3

1 Intensive care unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK; 2 Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; 3 Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, London, UK


PDF


BACKGROUND: Our objective was to the describe indications, management, complications and outcomes of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in COVID-19 critically ill patients. To contextualise these findings, comparisons were made against 36 non-COVID-19 consecutive patients requiring RRT on ICU.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single centre observational cohort study of patients requiring acute RRT between 1st March and 30th June 2020. Comparison was made against those receiving RRT in the pre-COVID-19 period from January 2019 to February 2020.
RESULTS: Of 154 COVID-19 patients, 47 (30.5%) received continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVHF), all of whom required mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support. The requirement for RRT was related to fluid balance rather than azotaemia. Compared to 36 non-COVID-19 patients, those with COVID-19 were younger (p=0.016) with a lower serum creatinine on hospital admission (p=0.049), and lesser degrees of metabolic acidosis (p<0.001) and lactataemia (p<0.001) before initiation of RRT. In addition, the duration of RRT requirement was longer (p<0.001). Despite lower CVVHF exchange rates with higher serum creatinine levels following RRT initiation in the COVID-19 patients, metabolic abnormalities were corrected. Hospital mortality was 60% among COVID-19 patients requiring RRT, compared to 67% in non-COVID patients (p=0.508), and renal recovery among survivors without pre-existing CKD was similar (p=0.231).
CONCLUSIONS: The requirement for RRT in COVID-19 patients was primarily related to fluid balance and using lower CVVHF exchange rates was effective to correct metabolic abnormalities. Renal recovery occurred in all but one patient by 60 days in the 40% of patients who survived.


KEY WORDS: Renal replacement therapy; COVID-19 pandemic; Resource management

top of page