Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 Feb 17



To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian


Publication history
Cite this article as



Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 Feb 17

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15129-6


language: English

Low diaphragm muscle mass predicts adverse outcome in patients hospitalized for Covid-19 pneumonia: an exploratory pilot study

Francesco CORRADI 1 , Alessandro ISIRDI 1, Paolo MALACARNE 2, Gregorio SANTORI 3, Greta BARBIERI 4, Chiara ROMEI 2, Tiziana BOVE 5, Luigi VETRUGNO 5, Marco FALCONE 4, Pietro BERTINI 2, Fabio GUARRACINO 2, Giovanni LANDONI 6, Francesco FORFORI 1, and the UCARE (Ultrasound in Critical care and Anesthesia Research Group)

1 Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 2 University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 3 Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; 4 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 5 Anesthesia and Intensive Care Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; 6 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy


BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether measurement of diaphragm thickness (DT) by ultrasonography may be a clinically useful noninvasive method for identifying patients at risk of adverse outcomes defined as need of invasive mechanical ventilation or death.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 77 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 infection admitted to our intermediate care unit in Pisa between March 5 and March 30, 2020, with follow up until hospital discharge or death. Logistic regression was used identify variables potentially associated with adverse outcomes and those P <0.10 were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. Cumulative probability for lack of adverse outcomes in patients with or without low baseline diaphragm muscle mass was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator.
RESULTS: The main findings of this study are that 1) patients who developed adverse outcomes had thinner diaphragm than those who did not (2.0 vs. 2.2 mm, P=0.001), 2) DT and lymphocyte count were independent significant predictors of adverse outcomes, with end-expiratory DT being the strongest (ß=-708; OR=0.492; P=0.018).
CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic ultrasound may be a valid tool to evaluate the risk of respiratory failure. Evaluating the need of mechanical ventilation treatment should be based not only on PaO2/FiO2, but on a more comprehensive assessment including DT because if the lungs become less compliant a thinner diaphragm, albeit free of intrinsic abnormality, may become exhausted, thus contributing to severe respiratory failure.

KEY WORDS: Diaphragmatic thickness; Acute respiratory failure; Point-of-care ultrasonography

top of page