Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 February;87(2) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 February;87(2):223-9

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

EXPERTS’ OPINION   Freefree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2021 February;87(2):223-9

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14797-7

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

PEEP in thoracic anesthesia: pros and cons

Denise BATTAGLINI 1, Lorenzo BALL 1, 2, Jakob WITTENSTEIN 3, Edmond COHEN 4, Marcelo GAMA DE ABREU 3, 5, Paolo PELOSI 1, 2

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy; 2 Department of Surgical Science and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; 3 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; 4 Department of Anesthesiology and Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 5 Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA



Protective ventilation includes a strategy with low tidal volume, Plateau pressure, driving pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and recruitment maneuvers on the ventilated lung. The rationale for the application of PEEP during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is that PEEP may contribute to minimize atelectrauma, preventing airway closure and alveolar collapse and improving the ventilation/perfusion to the ventilated lung. However, in case of high partial pressure of oxygen the application of PEEP may cause increased pulmonary vascular resistance, thus diverting blood flow to the non-ventilated lung, and worsening ventilation/perfusion. Further, PEEP may be associated with higher risk of hemodynamic impairment, increased need for fluids and vasoactive drugs. Positive effects on outcome have been reported by titrating PEEP according to driving pressure, targeted to obtain the optimum respiratory as well as pulmonary system compliance. This may vary according to the method employed for titration and should be performed individually for each patient. In summary, the potential for harm combined with the lack of evidence for improved outcome suggest that PEEP must be judiciously used during OLV even when titrated to a safe target, and only as much as necessary to maintain an appropriate gas exchange under low protective tidal volumes and driving pressures.


KEY WORDS: Positive-pressure respiration; One-lung ventilation; Anesthesia

top of page