Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2018 July;84(7) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2018 July;84(7):820-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Freefree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2018 July;84(7):820-8

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12282-0

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Immobilization during anesthesia for vitrectomy using a laryngeal mask without neuromuscular blockade versus endotracheal intubation and neuromuscular blockade

Axel FUDICKAR 1 , Matthias GRUENEWALD 1, Beate FUDICKAR 1, Moritz HILL 1, Martin WALLENFANG 1, Julia HÜLLEMANN 1, Dana VOSS 1, Amke CALIEBE 2, Johann B. ROIDER 3, Markus STEINFATH 1, Felix TREUMER 3

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; 2 Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany; 3 Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany


PDF


BACKGROUND: For intraocular surgery, most authors recommend general anesthesia including intubation and neuromuscular blockade to avoid complications by patient movements. However, anesthesia using a laryngeal mask and avoidance of muscle relaxants is common clinical practice. Purpose of this prospective observational study was to compare the incidence of eye movement and deviation of the eye axis during general anesthesia adjusted to minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) for pars plana-vitrectomy (PPV) using a laryngeal mask without neuromuscular blockade (LM) versus endotracheal intubation and neuromuscular blockade (INT).
METHODS: The patients (N.=148) who underwent PPV for vitreoretinal disorders received MAC adjusted general anesthesia by volatile anesthetics. Seventy-four patients were subjected to LM and 74 to INT. In both groups the patient’s lungs were mechanically ventilated without allowing spontaneous ventilation. Eye movements and upward deviations were judged and documented during surgery. Postoperatively quality of immobilization was assessed by a standardized questionnaire.
RESULTS: Intraoperative movements were not observed in either group. Upward eye deviation was observed in nine (12%) patients in the LM group, but not in patients in the INT group (0%; P=0.003). The standardized questionnaire revealed no clinically relevant difference in quality of immobilization between groups, especially eye deviations did not lead to any relevant surgical complications or difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS: For PPV, MAC adjusted balanced anesthesia using a laryngeal mask without neuromuscular blockade was associated with more, but clinically irrelevant upward eye deviations and may be an alternative to intubation with neuromuscular blockade. However, adequate depth of anesthesia must be assured to avoid unwanted injuries during surgery.


KEY WORDS: Vitrectomy - Immobilization - Muscle relaxation - Intubation - Laryngeal masks

top of page