Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2018 March;84(3) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2018 March;84(3):413-4

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,623


eTOC

 

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR  


Minerva Anestesiologica 2018 March;84(3):413-4

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12624-1

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

We still lack an effective method to identify the best supraglottic airway device

Marc KRIEGE 1 , Tim PIEPHO 2, Rüdiger R. NOPPENS 3

1 Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany; 2 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital of Barmherzigen Brüder, Trier, Germany; 3 Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada


PDF  


top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: April 3, 2018
Article first published online: January 29, 2018
Manuscript accepted: January 26, 2018
Manuscript revised: January 18, 2018
Manuscript received: December 4, 2017

Cite this article as

Kriege M, Piepho T, Noppens RR . We still lack an effective method to identify the best supraglottic airway device. Minerva Anestesiol 2018;84:413-4. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12624-1

Corresponding author e-mail

makriege@uni-mainz.de