Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 February;81(2) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 February;81(2):135-44

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   Free accessfree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 February;81(2):135-44

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Recommendations for intensive care follow-up clinics; report from a survey and conference of Dutch intensive cares

Van Der Schaaf M. 1, Bakhshi-Raiez F. 2, 3, Van Der Steen M. 4, 5, Dongelmans D. A. 3, 5, 6, De Keizer N. F. 2, 3

1 Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 2 Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 3 National Intensive Care Evaluation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 4 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands; 5 NVIC, Dutch Society for Intensive Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 6 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands


PDF


BACKGROUND: With the increasing awareness of postintensive care syndrome and the unbridled development of post-ICU clinics in the Netherlands, guidelines for ICU after care are needed. The purpose of this study was to develop recommendations for the set-up of post-ICU clinics.
METHODS: Recommendations regarding the design of post-ICU clinics were formulated based on a survey among Dutch ICUs and the available literature. Subsequently, in a round table conference stakeholders discussed and voted on a final approval of the recommendations.
RESULTS: The response rate of our survey was 70% (57 of 82), 40% of the respondents provided ICU after care. Twenty-one people from 16 ICUs participated in the round table conference. Only two studies are available with information on organization and effectiveness of post-ICU clinics.
It is recommended to invite patients who are mechanically ventilated for more than 2 days at a post-ICU clinic between 6 and 12 weeks after hospital discharge and screen for physical, psychological and cognitive impairments by using validated electronic patient-reported questionnaires. The set-up of a national registry for benchmarking and research purposes is suggested.
CONCLUSION: This study recommends how to organize post-ICU clinics based on literature and expert opinion. The implementation of the recommendations will facilitate the set-up of post-ICU clinics, research on effectiveness of post-ICU clinics and benchmarking of quality of ICU care.

top of page