Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2013 June;79(6) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2013 June;79(6):683-94

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions

 

REVIEWS   Freefree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2013 June;79(6):683-94

Copyright © 2013 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Non-invasive ventilation during upper endoscopies in adult patients. A systematic review

Cabrini L., Nobile L., Cama E., Borghi G., Pieri M., Bocchino S., Zangrillo A.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vita-Salute University and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy


PDF


Background: Upper endoscopies (UE) are widely performed. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) during UE has been used to avoid respiratory complications, mainly in high-risk or sedated patients. We performed a systematic review on this topic.
Methods: BioMedCentral, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials were searched (updated September 1, 2012). Further searches involved conference proceedings.
Results: We included in this systematic review 27 papers out of 405 publications retrieved. Ten studies reported the use without complications of NIV to assist fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). Ten studies described the use of NIV in fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubations. The authors reported no complications, even in hypoxemic patients and they observed only one failure (0.4%). Three studies evaluated the effectiveness of NIV during placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with neuromuscular diseases. In this group the failure rate was 4.4%. One study described the successful use of NIV in sedated patients undergoing gastroscopy. Three studies reported the successful application of NIV during trans-esophageal echocardiography. Overall, the procedure could not be performed due to inability of NIV to maintain safe intra-procedural ventilation in four out of total 515 cases of NIV-aided UE, suggesting a success rate higher than 99.2%.
Conclusion: This is the first systematic review addressing the use of NIV during upper endoscopies. Its use seems feasible, and based on the limited data available NIV appears safe and likely effective. The patients who would benefit the most are: high-risk and patients undergoing sedation.

top of page