Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2000 December;66(12) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2000 December;66(12):875-82

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  ANESTESIOLOGY Freefree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2000 December;66(12):875-82

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

Mechanical ventilation in adult respiratory distress syndrome. New trends

Pelosi P., Aspesi M., Franchi D., Colombo G., Gamberoni C., Caironi P., Bottino N.

Università degli Studi - Insubria (Varese) Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche Università degli Studi - Milano *Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS - Milano


PDF


Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by an inflammatory process affecting endothelial and epithelial lung tissue, with occurrence of hypoxemia, bilateral X-ray infiltrates, in absence of cardiogenic edema. The introduction of Computerized Tomography brought some improvements in understanding the ARDS lung, leading to a pulmonary model made up of three zones: 1) normally inflated, 2) recruitable and 3) consolidated. It has now been well established that mechanical ventilation of ARDS lung presents some iatrogenic effects that may affect mortality. Several mechanisms are considered responsible of ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI): high inspired oxygen fraction, high inspiratory plateau pressure and large tidal volume, and intratidal collapse and reinflation of alveolar units. In these years, different ventilatory strategies in the treatment of ARDS patients have been suggested to decrease and to prevent VALI. The most important one seems to be the application of an appropriate value of tidal volume and positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP). Several randomized studies, which compared low versus high tidal volumes, have recently been finished. Despite some difflerences, it seems that a ventilatory management limiting inspiratory plateau pressure to 35 cmH2O or lower may be useful to reduce VALI and mortality, also in association with a PEEP level sufficient to decrease the end-expiratory collapse. Another useful ventilatory tool for improving gas exchange and decreasing VALI in ARDS patients is likely the prone positioning, even if further studies are necessary to understand how this maneuver may really affect mortality. Another therapeutic instrument for improving oxygenation in ARDS patients is the inhalation of NO. Unfortunately, this pharmacological agent does not seem to affect the outcome of these patients.

top of page