![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |


YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
MEDICAL AREA
Medicina dello Sport 2020 December;73(4):626-34
DOI: 10.23736/S0025-7826.20.03518-8
Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English, Italian
Work rate and technical performance analyses of substitute players during the UEFA Euro 2016
Alliance KUBAYI ✉
Department of Sport, Rehabilitation and Dental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the work rate and technical performance of substitute players at the UEFA Euro 2016.
METHODS: Match performance indicators of 252 outfield players from 10 matches during the knockout stage were analyzed using the InStat multiple-camera tracking system (InStat, Moscow, Russia). Absolute distances (m) were converted to relative distance covered per unit of time (m/min).
RESULTS: The results showed that most substitutions occurred between the 75th and 90th minutes of the game. Overall, substitutes (109.8±10.9 m/min) covered more total distance than players who were replaced (109.2±10.3 m/min; Effect size [ES]=0.06, trivial effect) and those who completed the entire game (107.8±9.2 m/min; ES=0.20, small effect). Substitute players covered 30% and 35% more of high intensity running distance than players who were replaced (ES=0.99) or finished the entire match (ES=1.07), respectively, with moderate effects. Forward substitutes covered greater high-intensity running distances (13.4±3.3 m/min) than substitute defenders (10.2±3.1 m/min; ES=1.00, moderate effect) and midfielders (12.3±3.4 m/min; ES=0.33, small effect). The present observation indicated that substitute players (84.0%) performed a greater number of accurate passes compared to players who finished the whole game (82.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the players’ work-rate data could be useful to football coaches in making tactical substitutions targeted at improving overall team performance.
KEY WORDS: Football; Running; Athletic performance