Home > Journals > International Angiology > Past Issues > Articles online first > International Angiology 2022 Nov 23

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

International Angiology 2022 Nov 23

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.22.04952-5

Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Non-reversed bifurcated vein graft improves time to healing in ischemic patients undergoing lower limb distal bypass

Nicola TROISI 1 , Daniele ADAMI 1, Alberto PIAGGESI 2, Francesco CANOVARO 1, Letizia PIERUZZI 2, Lorenzo TORRI 1, Mauro FERRARI 1, Raffaella BERCHIOLLI 1

1 Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 2 Section of Diabetic Foot, Department of Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: Bifurcated vein grafts have been described in reconstructive microsurgery. No comparative studies have been published in lower limb arterial revascularization. The aim of this study was to compare non-reversed bifurcated vs. single vein graft in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing lower limb distal bypass.
METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2021 193 CLTI patients have been treated at our center with vein bypass, and distal anastomosis on infrapopliteal vessels; 137 patients (71%) received a single graft (Group SIN), and 56 patients (29%) had a bifurcated bypass (Group BIF). Primary outcomes measures were time to healing, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage. Two-year outcomes according to Kaplan-Meier curves were evaluated and compared.
RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic data, preoperative risk factors, and clinical presentation except for an elderly age in Group BIF (77.5 vs. 71.5 years; P<0.001). Intraoperative technical success was achieved in all patients. Overall median duration of follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range 9-36). Wound healing did not differ between the two groups (77.4% Group SIN vs. 73.2% Group BIF; P=0.33). Mean time to healing was faster in Group BIF (2.4 vs. 6.8 months; P<0.001). At 2-year follow-up there were no differences between the two groups in terms of primary patency (71.4% Group SIN vs. 54% Group BIF; P=0.10), primary assisted patency (81.7% Group SIN vs. 76.4% Group BIF; P=0.53), secondary patency (85.1% Group SIN vs. 80.9% Group BIF; P=0.79), and limb salvage (92.3% Group SIN vs. 87.2% Group BIF; P=0.64).
CONCLUSIONS: Bifurcated graft improved time to healing in CLTI patients undergoing infrapopliteal non-reversed vein bypass. Two-year overall patencies and limb salvage did not differ accordingly to vein graft configuration (single vs. bifurcated).


KEY WORDS: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia; Limb salvage; Saphenous vein

top of page