Home > Journals > International Angiology > Past Issues > International Angiology 2020 December;39(6) > International Angiology 2020 December;39(6):509-16

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE Free accessfree

International Angiology 2020 December;39(6):509-16

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04498-3

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Assessment of the relationship between death and CHA2DS2-VASc score in peripheral artery disease

Zafer YALIM 1 , Mustafa ALDEMIR 2, Sümeyra Alan YALIM 3

1 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar Health Science University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey; 2 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Health Sciences Higher Specialization Training and Research of Bursa, Bursa, Turkey; 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Afyonkarahisar, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey



BACKGROUND: The CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, female gender) score is used to estimate thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation (AF). Current studies have shown that CHA2DS2-VASc score can predict adverse clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease, stroke, and many diseases irrespective of the presence of AF. The usefulness of CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting mortality of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients is unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for mortality of PAD patients.
METHODS: A total of 396 patients diagnosed with PAD for the first time in our clinic between January 2010-July 2016 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups as deceased (group 1, N.=153) and living (group 2, N.=243). A ROC analysis was performed to determine if CHA2DS2VASc score could predict the death events among PAD patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the timing of death events in the two groups.
RESULTS: The mean ages of group 1 and group 2 were 76.6±0.81 and 66.5±0.83 (P=0.007), respectively. The CHA2DS2VASc scores of group-1 (4.37±0.1) and group 2 (2.96±0.9) were significantly different (P<0.001). A significant correlation between CHA2DS2VASc score and death was determined in Spearman correlation (R:0.454, P<0.001). According to multivariate cox regression analysis, CHA2DS2-VASc score [odds ratio (OR): 1.81 (95% CI: 1.42-2.30); P<0.001], Stroke [OR: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.21-0.85); P=0.016] and CRP [OR: 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.06); P=0.002] were independent predictors of death.
CONCLUSIONS: The CHA2DS2VASc score is directly related with mortality in PAD patients. The CHA2DS2VASc score may be a useful and practical scoring method to identify high-risk patients, and further future studies are needed to assess the role of CHA2DS2VASc score in PAD.


KEY WORDS: Coronary artery disease; Peripheral arterial disease; Mortality

top of page