Home > Journals > International Angiology > Past Issues > International Angiology 2018 October;37(5): > International Angiology 2018 October;37(5):411-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Freefree

International Angiology 2018 October;37(5):411-8

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.18.03969-X

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Prevention of venous thromboembolism through the implementation of a risk assessment tool: a comparative study in medical and surgical patients

Min Y. PARK 1, John P. FLETCHER 1, 2, 3, Carmen HOFFMANN 3, Alice LANCE 3, Fiona GAVEGAN 3, Kerry HITOS 1, 2, 3

1 The University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, Australia; 2 Westmead Research Centre for Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes, Westmead, Sydney, Australia; 3 Department of Surgery, University of Sydney, Westmead, Sydney, Australia


PDF


BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Underutilization of thromboprophylaxis remains common despite existing clinical guidelines. The aim is to evaluate the implementation of a state wide standardized adult VTE risk assessment tool (RAT) to assist in the screening of inpatients and prescribing of appropriate thromboprophylaxis.
METHODS: In total, 234 patients were audited using clinical notes and spot assessments for VTE risk at Western Sydney Local Health District over a two year period. Patients were stratified into pre- (N.=132) and postimplementation (N.=102) of the RAT. Intervention involved continuing education of staff and passive dissemination of guidelines. Prescription of pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis and the development of thromboembolic events were evaluated.
RESULTS: Overall, 39.0% of medical and 63.0% of surgical patients were risk assessed during preimplementation versus 39.2% and 92.2% during postimplementation of the RAT (P<0.0001). Usage of pharmacological prophylaxis increased from 72% to 79% and mechanical prophylaxis from 41% to 48%. VTE rates in moderate to high risk medical patients decreased from 15.2% preimplementation to 6.5% postimplementation. Rates of non-fatal and fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) were 2.3% and 0.8% respectively prior compared to 1.0% and 0.0% postimplementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Standardized VTE RAT increased thromboprophylaxis usage and decreased PE rates, with a greater improvement reflected in surgical patients. These findings highlight the importance of a multifaceted approach to VTE prevention using regular audits with feedback, electronic reminders systems, prescribing tools and continuing education.


KEY WORDS: Venous thromboembolism - Venous thrombosis - Pulmonary embolism - Risk assessment

top of page