Home > Journals > International Angiology > Past Issues > International Angiology 2017 June;36(3) > International Angiology 2017 June;36(3):254-60



Publication history
Cite this article as


A Journal on Angiology

Official Journal of the International Union of Angiology, the International Union of Phlebology and the Central European Vascular Forum
Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,37




International Angiology 2017 June;36(3):254-60

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03734-2


language: English

Patterns and determinants of use of pharmacological therapies for intermittent claudication in PAD outpatients: results of the IDOMENEO study

Claudio CIMMINIELLO 1, Hernan POLO FRIZ 1, 2, Giuseppe MARANO 3, Guido ARPAIA 4, Patrizia BORACCHI 3, Gabriella SPEZZIGU 2, Adriana VISONÀ 5 , on behalf of SIAPAV Investigators 

1 Center for Studies and Research, Italian Society of Angiology and Vascular Pathology (Società Italiana di Angiologia e Patologia Vascolare, SIAPAV), Milan, Italy; 2 Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Department, Vimercate Hospital, Vimercate, Monza-Brianza, Italy; 3 G. A. Maccacaro Laboratory of Medical Statistics, Epidemiology and Biometry, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; 4 Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Department, Carate Hospital, Carate Brianza, Monza-Brianza, Italy; 5 Department of Vascular Medicine, Castelfranco Veneto Hospital, Castelfranco Veneto, Treviso, Italy


BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) usually presents with intermittent claudication (IC). The aim of the present study was to assess, in clinical practice, the pattern of use of pharmacological therapies for IC in stable PAD outpatients.
METHODS: A propensity analysis was performed using data from the IDOMENEO study, an observational prospective multicenter cohort study. The association between any pharmacological symptomatic IC therapy with different variables was investigated using generalized linear mixed models with pharmacological therapy as response variable and binomial error.
RESULTS: Study population: 213 patients, male sex 147 (69.0%), mean age 70.0±8.6 years. Only 36.6% was under pharmacological treatment for IC, being cilostazol the most used medication (21.6%). Univariate analysis showed a probability of a patient of being assigned to any pharmacological symptomatic IC therapy of 67.0% when Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) <0.6 and 29.8% when ABI>0.6 (P=0.0048), and a propensity to avoid pharmacological treatment for patients with a high number of drugs to treat cardiovascular risk factors (probability of 55.2% for <4 drugs and 19.6% for >4 drugs, P=0.0317). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher probability of assigning treatment for ABI<0.6 (P=0.0274), and a trend to a lower probability in patients under polypharmacy (>4 drugs: OR=0.13, P=0.0546).
CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, only one third of stable outpatients with IC used symptomatic pharmacological therapy for IC. We found a propensity of clinicians to assign any symptomatic pharmacological IC therapy to patients with lower values of ABI and a propensity to avoid this kind of treatment in patients under polypharmacy.

KEY WORDS: Peripheral arterial disease - Intermittent claudication - Therapeutics - Patient compliance

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: March 27, 2017
Article first published online: September 6, 2016
Manuscript accepted: August 24, 2016
Manuscript received: May 18, 2016

Cite this article as

Cimminiello C, Polo Friz H, Marano G, Arpaia G, Boracchi P, Spezzigu G, et al.; SIAPAV Investigators. Patterns and determinants of use of pharmacological therapies for intermittent claudication in PAD outpatients: results of the IDOMENEO study. Int Angiol 2017;36:254-60. DOI. 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03734-2

SIAPAV Investigators

Maria AMITRANO (AORN Moscati, Avellino, Italy); Alfio AMATO, Ludovica MIGLIACCIO, Eleonora CONTI (Policlinico Sant’Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy); Diego TONELLO, Beniamino Zalunardo (Ospedale Castelfranco Veneto, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy); Michele MAZZULLO (U.O.C Medicina, A.O. Lecco, Lecco, Italy); Loredana MARESCA, Giuseppe LEONARDO, Eliodoro SCUDIERI (A.O. dei Colli, Napoli, Italy); Romeo MARTINI, Filippo BROCADELLO (A.O.U. di Padova, Padova, Italy); Glauco MILIO, Donata La ROSA (A.O.U. Policlinico Giaccone, Palermo, Italy); Mirta D’ORAZIO (Clinica Pierangeli, Pescara, Italy); Rita PEPE (Ospedale Sant’Eugenio, Roma, Italy); Rosario GRECO, Vincenzo PRISCO (A.O.U. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, Salerno, Italy); Enrico AROSIO, Fanny RULFO (Dipartimento di Medicina, Università di Verona, Verona, Italy); Guido ARPAIA (Ospedale di Vimercate, Vimercate, Italy).

Corresponding author e-mail