Home > Journals > International Angiology > Past Issues > International Angiology 2016 February;35(1) > International Angiology 2016 February;35(1):31-9



To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian


Cite this article as



International Angiology 2016 February;35(1):31-9


language: English

Evaluation of functionality and biological response of the multilayer flow modulator in porcine animal models

Sherif SULTAN 1, 2, Edel P. KAVANAGH 2, Niamh HYNES 2, Edward B. DIETHRICH 3

1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Western Vascular Institute, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland; 2 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Galway Clinic, Doughiska, Galway, Ireland; 3 Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, Arizona Heart Foundation, Phoenix, AZ, USA


BACKGROUND: This study outlines the use of non-aneurysmal porcine animal models to study device functionality and biological response of the Multilayer Flow Modulator (MFM) (Cardiatis, Isnes, Belgium), with an emphasis on preclinical device functionality and biological response characteristics in an otherwise healthy aorta.
METHODS: Twelve animals were implanted with the study device in the abdominal aorta, in 6 animals for 1 month and 6 animals for 6 months. Upon completion of the study period, each animal underwent a necropsy to examine how the implanted device had affected the artery and surrounding tissue. Neointima and stenosis formation were recorded via morphometry, and endothelialization via histopathological analysis.
RESULTS: The MFM devices were delivered to their respective implantation sites without difficulty. Six of the implanted stents were oversized with percentages ranging from 2.6% to 18.8%. Statistical analysis was carried out and showed no significance between the regular sized stent group and oversized stent group for neointimal area (P=0.17), neointimal thickness (P=0.17), and percentage area stenosis (P=0.65). Histopathological findings showed in most areas flattened endothelium like cells lined the luminal surface of the neointima. Scanning electron microscopy also showed the devices were well tolerated, inciting only a minimal neointimal covering and little fibrin or platelet deposition. Neointimal thickness of 239.7±55.6 μm and 318.3±130.4 μm, and percentage area stenosis of 9.6±2.6% and 12.6±5% were recorded at 1 and 6 months respectively. No statistical differences were found between these results.
CONCLUSION: The MFM devices were delivered to their respective implantation sites without difficulty and incited little neointimal and stenosis formation in the aorta, affirming its functionality and biocompatibility.

top of page