Home > Journals > International Angiology > Past Issues > International Angiology 2009 December;28(6) > International Angiology 2009 December;28(6):461-8



To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian




Original articles   

International Angiology 2009 December;28(6):461-8


language: English

The importance of a standing position in the diagnosis of nutcracker phenomenon by duplex sonography

Romera-Villegas A. 1, Vila-Coll R. 1, Cairols-Castellote M. 1, Poveda-Monge R. 2, Masuet-Aumatell C. 3, Gri-nyó-Boira M. 2

1 Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; 2 Unit of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; 3 Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain


AIM: To determine the clinical usefulness of Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of the Nutcracker phenomenon, as an alternative to computed tomographic scans (CT).
METHODS: This study consisted of 52 patients that presented with intermittent hematuria of unknown origin between January 2006 to April 2008. Doppler ultrasonography was used to assess the left renal vein (LRV) by measuring the anteroposterior (AP) diameter and peak systolic velocity (PSV) in supine and standing positions, at the hilar and interaortomesenteric portions of the LRV. These data were compared with CT scans. The sensitivity and specificity of duplex sonography was determined using the AP diameter and PSV ratios to assess the cut-off levels. Kappa (k) statistic was also evaluated.
RESULTS: mean AP diameters of the LRV measured by Doppler sonography were 8.38 mm at the hilar and 3.17 mm under the SMA, compared to 9.3 mm (hilar) and 3.2 mm (SMA) in the supine and standing position respectively. The PSV in the supine position was 25.77 cm/s and 115.48 cm/s, respectively, compared to 25.54 cm/s and 125.96 cm/s in the standing position. The cut-off levels were 3.85 (sensitivity: 61.5%, specificity: 80.8%, k:0.42) for the supine and 4.12 (sensitivity:61.5%, specificity: 65.4%, k: 0.27) for the standing AP diameter, 2.99 (sensitivity: 92.3%, specificity: 73.1%, k: 0.65) for the supine and 3.73 (sensitivity: 96.4%, specificity: 79.2%, k: 0.76) for the standing PSV.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the standing PSV ratio is the best parameter for to detecting entrapment of the LRV.

top of page