Home > Journals > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche > Past Issues > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2017 January-February;176(1-2) > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2017 January-February;176(1-2):50-6

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2017 January-February;176(1-2):50-6

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-3660.16.03284-8

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

A comparison of different methods to isolating primordial germ cells

Mohsen NAEEMIPOUR

Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran


PDF


BACKGROUND: Role of PGCs for producing transgenic chickens has significantly increased recently as a result of their exclusives capabilities. Primordial germ cells (PGCs) isolation in high numbers is the first step toward transgenic chicken production.
METHODS: In the present study we used the main methods to purify chicken PGCs including the isolating of PGCs with ammonium chloride-potassium (ACK) buffer, Ficoll and percoll density gradient centrifugation, and using the Magnetic cell sorting (MACS). We compared the methods based on the number of PGCs obtained.
RESULTS: Our results show that Ficoll density gradient centrifugation method is the preferential method.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a demand for a more suitable method for more efficient PGCs isolation.


KEY WORDS: Embryonic germ cells - Ficoll - Cell separation

top of page