Home > Journals > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche > Past Issues > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2004 December;163(6) > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2004 December;163(6):285-90

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

CLINICAL CASES   

Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2004 December;163(6):285-90

Copyright © 2004 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Treatment evaluation of brain tumors using non-linear analysis of magnetoencephalographic data. A novel technique

Antoniou P. 1, Anninos P. A. 1, Piperidou H. 2, Adamopoulos A. 1, Kotini A. 1, Koukourakis M. I. 3, Sivridis E. 4

1 Laboratory of Medical Physics, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece; 2 Department of Neurology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece; 3 Department of Radiotherapy, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece; 4 Department of Pathological Anatomy, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece


PDF


We ­present the re­sults ­that show­case a nov­el tech­nique ­that can be ­used to in­crease the spec­i­fic­ity of treat­ment eval­u­a­tion pro­ce­dures by ­means of dif­fer­en­tiat­ing the Magnetoencephalo-graphic (MEG) sig­nals re­ceived ­from pa­tients ­with ma­lig­nant cen­tral ner­vous ­system (CNS) le­sions, dur­ing treat­ment us­ing non-lin­e­ar anal­y­sis. We ­present re­cord­ings ­from 2 pa­tients di­ag­nosed ­with ma­lig­nant CNS le­sions. A 122-chan­nel ­SQUID bi­o­mag­ne­tom­e­ter in an ap­pro­pri­ate shield­ed ­room was ­used to ­record the MEG sig­nals and the Grassberger-Procaccia meth­od of ­phase ­space re­con­struc­tion was ap­plied to the re­cord­ed sig­nal ­from ­each pa­tient. By ap­ply­ing the Grassberger-Procaccia meth­od of ­phase ­space re­con­struc­tion to the MEG of pa­tients ­with ma­lig­nant CNS le­sions we ­found ­clear ev­i­dence link­ing the em­bed­ding di­men­sion m in ­which we ­have the on­set of sat­u­ra­tion ­with the ­progress of the treat­ment. These 2 ­case re­ports pro­vide a ­clear in­di­ca­tion ­that the pre­treat­ment MEG sig­nals of CNS ma­lig­nant le­sions ­present ­strong qual­ita­tive and quan­ti­ta­tive dif­fer­enc­es ­from the af­ter-treat­ment MEG sig­nals of the ­same le­sions and ­that non-lin­e­ar anal­y­sis of MEG sig­nals can be ­used for the pur­pose of treat­ment mon­i­tor­ing dur­ing ra­dio­ther­a­py. Further re­search is be­ing con­duct­ed in or­der to as­cer­tain pos­sible quan­ti­ta­tive thresh­olds in the val­ue of the em­bed­ding di­men­sion m ­above ­which sat­u­ra­tion oc­curs and to con­firm the phys­io­log­i­cal mech­a­nism ­which ­would ex­plain our find­ings.

top of page