Home > Journals > Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica > Past Issues > Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica 2002 June;48(2) > Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica 2002 June;48(2):203-6

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe PROMO
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions

 

  FIRST WORKSHOP ON HELICOBACTER PYLORI 

Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica 2002 June;48(2):203-6

Copyright © 2002 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Diagnostic use of endoscopic mucosal resection in “borderline” gastric lesions unresolved with standard biopsies

Mazzucco D., Venturini I., Bollito E., Gubetta G., Suriani R.



Background. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of gastric superficial malignancies less than 20 mm in size and flat or slightly elevated without ulceration can be a definitive treatment, but its role in lesions of uncertain etiology or in which standard biopsies specimens fail to determine diagnosis is uncertain. EMR was performed in 7 patients previously diagnosed as having low grade dysplasia (Category 3 of Vienna classification) by standard biopsies on polypoid or flat gastric lesions.
Methods. After day spraying with 0.2% indigo carmine and injection of 20 ml saline with adrenaline 1/20000, EMR of flat or sessile polyps (size between 5 to 15 mm) was performed by the Cap and Suction technique (Inoue).
Results. In 3 patients a previous diagnosis of low grade dysplasia was changed into high grade dysplasia, in 1 patient adenocarcinoma was found at EMR histology. In 3 patients EMR confirmed diagnosis made with routine endoscopy biopsies and finally in 2 patients dysplasia was down-graded into intestinal metaplasia.
Conclusions. EMR may be considered in diagnostic gastric lesions with low grade dysplasia at standard biopsies (Category 3 of Vienna Classification of gastrointestinal neoplasia).

top of page