Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > Articles online first > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2020 May 08

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

 

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2020 May 08

DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06104-3

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Randomized comparison of functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position and motor program activating therapy: treating foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis

Terezie PROKOPIUSOVA 1, Marketa PAVLIKOVA 1, 2, Magdalena MARKOVA 1, Kamila RASOVA 1

1 Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; 2 Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic


PDF


BACKGROUND: Functional Electric Stimulation (FES) is recommended for foot drop in multiple sclerosis, although little is known about its therapeutic effect.
AIM: To evaluate a therapeutic effect immediately and two months after program termination (persistent and delayed effect) of a new approach using FES in combination with correcting the patients’ postural system. More specifically, we evaluate the effects of this approach on the patients’ clinical functions and compared it with individual physiotherapy.
DESIGN: Parallel randomised blind trial.
SETTING: 2-month long treatments, Functional Electric Stimulation in Posturally Corrected Position (Group 1) and neuroproprioceptive facilitation and inhibition physiotherapy called Motor Program Activating Therapy (Group 2).
POPULATION: 44 subjects with Multiple Sclerosis.
METHODS: Primary outcomes: gait (the 2-Minute Walk Test; Timed 25-Foot Walk test; Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12) and balance (by e.g. Berg Balance Scale, BBS; The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale, ABC; Timed Up and Go Test, TUG). Secondary outcomes: mobility, cognition, fatigue and subjects’ perceptions (e. g. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale, MSIS; Euroqol-5 dimensions-5 levels, EQ-5D-5L).
RESULTS: Group 1 showed immediate therapeutic effect in BBS (p = 0.008), ABC (p=0.04) and EQ-5D-5L (self-care, p=0.019, mobility p=0,005). The improvement in EQ-5D-5L persisted and in TUGcognitive we documented a delayed effect (p=0.005). Group 2 showed an immediate improvement in BBS (p = 0.025), MSIS (p=0.043) and several aspects of daily life (the effect on health today was significantly higher than in Group 1, significant difference between groups p=0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: FES in the Posturally Corrected Position has an immediate therapeutic effect on balance and patients’ perceptions comparable to Motor Program Activating Therapy, and higher persistent and even delayed therapeutic effect.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study results point to the importance of correcting the patients’ posture when applying FES, the possibility to treat foot drop by individual physiotherapy and the activation of the patients’ auto reparative processes.


KEY WORDS: Multiple sclerosis; Electrical stimulation; Posture; Rehabilitation

top of page