Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > Articles online first > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2019 Nov 18

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

 

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2019 Nov 18

DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05835-0

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

A comparative study of the dose-dependent effects of low level and high intensity photobiomodulation (laser) therapy on pain and electrophysiological parameters in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Kamran EZZATI 1, E-Liisa LAAKSO 2, Alia SABERI 3 , Shahrokh YOUSEFZADEH CHABOK 4, Ebrahim NASIRI 1, Babak BAKHSHAYESH EGHBALI 3

1 Neuroscience Research Center, Poorsina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran; 2 School of Allied Health Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia; 3 Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Neurology, Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran; 4 Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience Research Center, Poorsina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran


PDF


BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common peripheral nerve disorder of the wrist. Nonsurgical treatments e.g. laser therapy may cause potential beneficial effects.
AIM: To compare the dose dependent effects of low level laser therapy (LLLT) and high intensity laser therapy (HILT) on pain and electrophysiology studies in patients with CTS.
DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Outpatient physiotherapy clinic.
POPULATION: Ninety-eight participants with CTS, aged between 20 to 60 years, were randomly assigned to five groups.
METHODS: All participants undertook four standard exercises, with one group serving as exercise-only controls. Patients were randomly allocated to either high or low fluence LLLT or high or low fluence HILT received over 5 sessions. All patients were assessed by visual analogue scale, median compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and sensory nerve conduction studies before and 3 weeks after the interventions.
RESULTS: VAS was significantly lower in all groups after 3 weeks (P<0.05). CMAP latency decreased in all groups. The interaction of group and time (5×2) was significant for pain (P<0.001), the latency of CMAP (P=0.001) and CMAP amplitude (P=0.02). The interaction of group and time was not significant for the CMAP conduction velocity, sensory nerve latency and amplitude (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: HILT with a power of 1.6 W and low fluence of 8 J/cm2 was superior in reduction of pain and improvement of the median motor nerve electrophysiological studies compared to LLLT and exercise-only control groups.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: LLLT and HILT in conjunction with exercise program are effective in reducing pain and improving median motor nerve conduction studies of the patients with CTS. It seems that high power and low fluence laser therapy is better than LLLT and exercise interventions to treat these patients.


KEY WORDS: Carpal tunnel syndrome; Low level laser therapy; High intensity laser therapy; Exercise; Electrophysiological Study

top of page