![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |


YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Free access
European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2022 June;58(3):470-7
DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.07095-7
Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Mild cognitive impairment in patients with acute heart failure does not limit the effectiveness of early phase II cardiac rehabilitation
Junichi YOKOTA 1, 2 ✉, Ren TAKAHASHI 3, Takaaki CHIBA 3, Keisuke MATSUSHIMA 3
1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Division of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan; 2 Department of Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan; 3 Department of Rehabilitation, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is commonly performed in patients with heart failure (HF) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, whether MCI diminishes the benefit of early phase II CR is unclear.
AIM: This study aimed to clarify whether MCI diminishes the benefit of early phase II CR in patients hospitalized for HF.
DESIGN: The design of the work is a case-control study.
SETTING: All HF patients who underwent CR in acute care hospitals in Japan from April 2016 to March 2021.
POPULATION: Among the 574 patients who underwent CR, 204 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were age <65 years, dependence for activities of daily living (ADLs) prior to admission, diagnosis of dementia or delirium, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score at the commencement of CR<19, missing data, in-hospital death, and transfer to another department during hospitalization.
METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups, those with MCI (MCI group, N.=134) and those without MCI (non-MCI group, N.=70), based on MMSE score at the commencement of CR. Cognitive impairment was defined as a score of <19. MCI was defined as an MMSE score between 19 and 26, and normal cognitive function was defined as MMSE >26. The primary outcomes were the 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), Barthel Index (BI), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). All patients underwent guideline-based CR programs.
RESULTS: On admission, MCI patients had significantly lower BI (P<0.01, confidence interval [CI]: 4.9-20.4) and SPPB (P<0.01, CI: 1.1-3.1), despite being independent for ADLs before admission. In addition, 6MWD (P<0.01, CI: 31.2-97.2), BI (P=0.01, CI: 1.0-8.4), and SPPB (P<0.01, CI: 0.6-2.5) were significantly lower in the MCI group at the time of discharge. However, after propensity score matching to adjust for baseline characteristics, no significant differences in any primary outcome were found between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The BI, SPPB, and 6MWD improvements due to CR were similar, regardless of MCI.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Our results may inform the selection of appropriate rehabilitation interventions for patients with HF and MCI.
KEY WORDS: Cardiac rehabilitation; Cognitive dysfunction; Heart failure