Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2020 February;56(1) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2020 February;56(1):24-33

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Freefree

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2020 February;56(1):24-33

DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05847-7

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

A multimodal training with visual biofeedback in subacute stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial

Emilia AMBROSINI 1 , Elisabetta PERI 2, Claudia NAVA 2, Luca LONGONI 2, Marco MONTICONE 3, 4, Alessandra PEDROCCHI 1, Giorgio FERRIERO 2, Simona FERRANTE 1

1 Neuroengineering and Medical Robotics Laboratory, Department of Electronics, Information Technology, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy; 2 Rehabilitation Unit of Lissone Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Lissone, Monza e Brianza, Italy; 3 Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 4 Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, G. Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy



BACKGROUND: Early interventions maximizing patient’s involvement are essential to promote gait restoration and motor recovery after stroke.
AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a multimodal biofeedback training involving cycling augmented by functional electrical stimulation (FES) and balance exercises on walking ability and motor recovery.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (NCT02439515).
SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation facility.
POPULATION: Subacute stroke survivors (less than 6 months from the first event) aged up to 90 years old.
METHODS: Sixty-eight participants were randomly allocated to an experimental group, performing 15 sessions of biofeedback FES-cycling training followed by 15 sessions of biofeedback balance training (20 minutes each) in addition to usual care (70 minutes), and a control group performing 30 sessions (90 minutes) of usual care. Participants were evaluated before training, after 15 sessions, after 30 sessions, and at 6-month follow-up through: gait speed (primary outcome), spatiotemporal gait parameters, Six-Minute Walking Test, Functional Independence Measure, Motricity Index, Trunk Control Test, Berg Balance Scale, and Fall Efficacy Scale.
RESULTS: Both groups significantly improved over time, but no group and interaction effects were found for any outcomes. The 73% of the experimental group achieved a clinically meaningful change in gait speed compared to the 38% of the control group (P=0.048). These percentages were even more unbalanced for patients with a moderate to severe gait impairment at baseline (91% versus 36%; P=0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal biofeedback training was not statistically superior to usual care, showing only a positive trend in favor of the experimental group on locomotion recovery. Patients initially not able to walk might be the best candidates for such a training.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The multimodal biofeedback training is a task-specific, repetitive and intensive training requiring a minimal supervision, which might result in a lower staff to patient ratio if organized in group sessions. Therefore, it can represent a good alternative for early stroke rehabilitation.


KEY WORDS: Stroke; Rehabilitation; Randomized controlled trial; Psychology biofeedback; Electrical stimulation therapy

top of page