Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2017 June;53(3) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2017 June;53(3):483-91

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW   Freefree

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2017 June;53(3):483-91

DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04252-0

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Local corticosteroid versus autologous blood injections in lateral epicondylitis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Felice SIRICO , Flavia RICCA, Franca DI MEGLIO, Daria NURZYNSKA, Clotilde CASTALDO, Rocco SPERA, Stefania MONTAGNANI

Sports Medicine Division, Department of Public Health, Federico II University, Naples, Italy


PDF


INTRODUCTION: Lateral epicondylitis is a common painful elbow disorder. Several approaches to treatment have been proposed, with a local injection of corticosteroids being the most frequently used. Recent insights into the pathophysiology encouraged the introduction of autologous blood injections as an alternative treatment method. The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize quantitatively the evidence regarding the efficacy of corticosteroids and autologous blood injections for treatment of pain in lateral epicondylitis.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Studies were considered eligible based on the following inclusion criteria: adult human, diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis, randomized controlled trials comparing corticosteroids versus autologous blood injections, pain assessment. Exclusion criteria were previous surgery for lateral epicondylitis or for other elbow disorders, concurrent treatment with drugs or physiotherapy, diagnosis of musculoskeletal systemic disorder. A systematic search of literature was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Effect size of each included study was calculated and analyzed in a random-effects model.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Four studies, enrolling total of 218 patients (139 females and 79 males), were included in quantitative analysis. At 2 weeks, there was a trend towards a reduction of VAS score in the corticosteroid group (WMD=2.12 [95% CI: 4.38 to 0.14], P=0.07). No significant differences were recorded in the medium-term (4-12 weeks; WMD=0.85 [95% CI: -0.44 to 2.15], P=0.19) and long-term (24 weeks; WMD=0.63 [95% CI: -2.40 to 3.66], P=0.68) follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Few high-quality trials compare the efficacy of corticosteroid and autologous blood injections in the control of pain related to lateral epicondylitis. Available data indicate that corticosteroids tend to reduce VAS score in short-term follow-up, although these data are not statistically significant. No differences were recorded in the medium and long term. Contrary to popular opinion among medical professionals, and despite pathophysiological cues, the currently available data offer no support for the effectiveness of autologous blood injections in medium- and long-term follow-up. Further studies are necessary to establish which treatment has more impact on pain in lateral epicondylitis. These data could be then used as a basis for practical guidelines and new protocols of treatment.


KEY WORDS: Tennis elbow - Adrenal cortex hormones - Autologous blood transfusion - Pain management

top of page