![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |


YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
CASE REPORT
Chirurgia 2020 June;33(3):157-9
DOI: 10.23736/S0394-9508.19.04968-4
Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Iatrogenic injury of the spinal accessory nerve in selective superficial parotidectomy
Ida M. STEFANIZZI 1, Giulia PETRONI 1, Margherita PALLOCCI 1, Michele TREGLIA 1, Mauro ARCANGELI 2, Pasquale GIUGLIANO 3, Alessandro FEOLA 4 ✉
1 Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy; 2 Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 3 Unit of Legal Medicine, A.O.R.N. “Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano”, Caserta, Italy; 4 Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
The spinal accessory nerve, also known as accessory nerve, is the eleventh cranial nerve. It is responsible for the motor innervation of the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscle. The sternocleidomastoid muscle tilts and rotates the head, while the trapezius muscle, connecting to the scapula, elevate the shoulder girdle and retract the girdle dorsally. Spinal accessory nerve injury commonly occurs during neck dissection surgery, either elective or therapeutic procedure, performed to treat head and neck carcinoma. The Authors described the case of a 50-year-old man who underwent surgery for a parotid neoformation. After the superficial left parotidectomy emerged neck pain, weakness of the trapezius muscle and functional impotence of the left shoulder. Following diagnostic tests, was properly diagnosed an iatrogenic accessory nerve injury. The main purpose is to determine possible predictive factors related to the occurrence of accessory nerve injury during superficial parotidectomy and the possibility to recognize the error immediately after surgery when surgical repair has the great chance of success. Probably the awareness of the possibility of a iatrogenic injury and its consequences, even during reconstruction using the SMAS flap after superficial parotidectomy, would avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment.
KEY WORDS: Accessory nerve; Trauma, nervous system; Liability, legal