Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2022 February;63(1) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2022 February;63(1):2-7

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

REVIEW  ATHERECTOMY 

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2022 February;63(1):2-7

DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.21.12172-X

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Systematic review of atherectomy of inguinal arteries for atherosclerotic lesions

Marco V. USAI 1 , Alice LILLU 1, Giuseppe ASCIUTTO 2, Martin J. AUSTERMANN 1, Arne G. SCHWINDT 1

1 Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany; 2 Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden



INTRODUCTION: Surgical endarterectomy represents the gold standard for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the groin vessels. Endovascular treatment such as atherectomy with or without drug coated angioplasty (DCA) of the so called no stenting zones, i.e. inguinal and popliteal vessels, is gaining growing acceptance as alternative option to open surgery. This systematic review aims to scrutiny the current clinical evidence regarding atherectomy and DCA for the common artery (CFA).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted an exhaustive research in multiple platforms (Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Embase) on studies over atherectomy and angioplasty for inguinal atherosclerotic lesions published between 2000 and 2021. As search strategy we used a wide list of MeSH items, words, synonyms. Bibliographies of review articles were checked for further relating studies regarding atherectomy of CFA. A qualitative and quantitative data analysis was carried out.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative review. Not all studies were focused only on atherectomy of inguinal vessels, despite including such treatment. Hence, data regarding this treatment were not exhaustive. A fairly homogeneous data analysis was possible in 7 of 15 studies. The remaining 8 studies were qualitatively analyzed but not included in the statistical analysis. In all 7 included studies directional atherectomy and DCA under filter protection were carried out. In this subgroup, overall, 497 patients were treated with atherectomy. Sixty-eight percent of the patients were males. Rutherford class from 1-3 dominated against 4-6 (63% vs. 37%). Mean technical success rate was 96%, with a primary and secondary patency rate of 92% and 98% respectively at one year. Procedure related vascular complications ranged from 1% to 6%.
CONCLUSIONS: Current literature about atherectomy for inguinal arteries is scant, data are inhomogeneous and so are treatment modalities. Nevertheless, the results of this systematic review suggest that this endovascular strategy is feasible with good short and midterm results. Prospective trials with larger patient cohorts are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.


KEY WORDS: Atherectomy; Femoral artery; Endovascular procedures

top of page