Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2017 December;58(6) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2017 December;58(6):875-82

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

REVIEW  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN JUXTARENAL AND AORTO-ILIAC INTERVENTIONS 

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2017 December;58(6):875-82

DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.17.10100-X

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Next generation post EVAR follow-up regime

Rita SOARES FERREIRA 1, 2 , Frederico BASTOS GONÇALVES 1, 2

1 Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Santa Marta Hospital, CHLC, Lisbon, Portugal; 2 Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal


PDF


Durability of endovascular aneurysm repair is critical, since a significant proportion of patients suffer from procedure-related complications and secondary interventions after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Therefore, regular follow up including imaging is recommended. The rationale behind current surveillance programs is to allow early detection and elective treatment of complications. However, current recommendations are laborious and resource consuming, may be deleterious to many patients and are largely inefficient. Furthermore, they do not account for novel imaging modalities or for the use of new endovascular devices. The authors review the current recommendations from international societies, and of the evidence for new imaging modalities that could be as alternatives, namely contrast enhanced ultrasound, three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound and digital tomosynthesis. The evidence on surveillance after repair with new devices, specifically with sealing technology, and its imaging specificities is also discussed. Lastly, the authors review the evidence for risk stratification of surveillance. Stratified follow up regimes may be based on preoperative anatomical characteristics or on postoperative imaging results, at different time points. Effective sealing, absence of endoleaks and sac dynamics are the most commonly used factors for stratification. In conclusion, there is still no consensus on surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair, with regard to both modality and timing. Novel devices, and especially those using sealing technology, require more intensive surveillance as the expected results at mid- and long-term remain undetermined. Risk stratification of follow-up seems possible but still requires prospective validation before generalization.


KEY WORDS: Aortic aneurysm, abdominal - Endovascular procedures - Follow-up studies

top of page