Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 December;45(6) > The journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 December;45(6):557-64

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  CARDIAC SECTION 

The journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 December;45(6):557-64

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Aortic valve replacement with the Cryolife-O’Brien stentless aortic bioprosthesis: five-year experience

Martinovic I. 1, Farah I. 1, Everlien M. 1, Knez I. 2, Greve H. P. 1, Vogt P. 2

1 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Klinikum Krefeld, Germany 2 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Germany


PDF


Aim. Improved hemodynamics with stentless bioprosthesis compared to stented valves have been well documented. It has been suggested that a simplified implant model, the Cryolife-O’Brien, offers less satisfactory outcomes compared with standard stentless models. This study was conducted to prospectively evaluate the midterm results after aortic valve replacement with the Cryolife-O’Brien stentless bioprosthesis.
Methods. In 1996, the prospective clinical trial using different stentless valves was initiated in our center. From September 1996 through August 2001, 132 consecutive patients with a mean age of 72.5 years underwent aortic valve replacement with the Cryolife-O’Brien porcine stentless bioprosthesis by the same surgeon. The predominant aortic valve lesion was stenosis in 110 cases and insufficiency in 22 cases. Patients have been followed-up from 2 to 60 months, mean 28 months. Echocardiography was performed by the same echocardiographer preoperatively, intraoperatively, postoperatively at discharge, 2 to 6 months later and annually thereafter.
Results. Sixty-five percent of patients received a valve 25 mm in diameter or larger, 42% had concomitant coronary bypass grafting. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 6.8 %. Nine late deaths, none related to the valve, have occurred. Severe aortic insufficiency caused by oversizing led to early reoperation in 3 patients. The peak and mean systolic gradients decreased significantly during the first 12 months after implantation (p<0.001) and the effective valve areas increased significantly during this time interval (p<0.001). Eleven patients have aortic insufficiency, trivial in 7 and mild in 4. The actuarial survival at 5 years was 86±3%. The rate for freedom from endocarditis was 100% and for freedom from thromboembolic events 92%.
Conclusion. The Cryolife-O‘Brien stentless bioprosthesis has superior hemodynamics and a low rate of valve-related complications thus representing a very good alternative to conventional stented bioprosthesis. The midterm results are encouraging but further follow-up is needed to determine the valve’s durability.

top of page