Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 August;45(4) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 Auguste;45(4):321-33

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions

 

REVIEWS  ENDOVASCULAR SECTION - ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS: LATEST RESULTS 

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 Auguste;45(4):321-33

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Short- and long-term outcome following endovascular aneurysm repair. How does it compare to open surgery?

Zarins C. K., Heikkinen M. A., Lee E. S., Alsac J. M., Arko F. R.

Division of Vascular Surgery Stanford University, Medical Center Stanford, CA, USA


PDF


The primary objective of aneurysm repair is to prevent aneurysm rupture while avoiding aneurysm-related death. This manuscript reviews the primary and secondary outcome measures following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in relation to similar outcome measures for open surgical repair. Both EVAR and open repair are effective in preventing aneurysm rupture, although late ruptures can occur with either treatment method. The late risk of rupture following EVAR is less that 1% per year using current endovascular devices. Aneurysm-related death rate appears to be lower following EVAR compared to open surgery, primarily due to a lower perioperative mortality rate. Actuarial 5-year survival after both endovascular and open aneurysm repair is approximately 70%. Perioperative outcome measures favor EVAR over open repair for patients with suitable anatomy with reduced morbidity and more rapid patient recovery. Short and long-term outcomes following endovascular repair compare favorably to open repair. However, prospective studies are needed to better define the long-term outcomes using comparable endpoints.

top of page