Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2003 April;44(2) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2003 April;44(2):173-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  CARDIAC SECTION 

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2003 April;44(2):173-8

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Implantation of the coronary arteries after reconstruction of the neoaorta by using pericardial or pulmonary hood techniques. A significant impact on the outcome of arterial switch operations

Tireli E., Korkut A. K., Basaran M.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey


PDF


Aim. Cor­o­nary ­artery ­anomaly and tech­niques ­used for ­their ­transfer are the ­major ­risk fac­tors for the arte­rial ­switch oper­a­tion. ­Although var­ious ­methods ­have ­been ­described, tor­sion and ­stretching of the cor­o­nary ­arteries con­tinue to ­trouble sur­geons. Espe­cially, in ­cases in ­which ­there is a ­size mis­match ­between the ­aorta and the pul­mo­nary ­artery, the ­true cor­o­nary implan­ta­tion ­points can ­change.
­Methods. We ­studied the inci­dence of myo­car­dial ­ischemia in 40 ­patients who under­went a ­Jatene pro­ce­dure ­from Jan­uary 1997 to ­August 2000 at ­Istanbul Med­ical ­Faculty of ­Istanbul Uni­ver­sity. In all ­cases; ­firstly, the neo-­aortic anas­tom­osis was per­formed. ­After ­filling the neo-­aorta by ­removing the ­aortic ­cross-­clamp, we ­aimed to iden­tify the ­exact cor­o­nary implan­ta­tion ­points. In 26 ­cases, ­direct re-implan­ta­tion or ­trap-­door tech­niques ­were the ­method of ­choice ­used for the implan­ta­tion. In 14 ­cases, we ­used per­i­car­dial or pul­mo­nary ­hood aug­men­ta­tion tech­niques. In 12 of ­these 14 ­cases, we ­used ­directly per­i­car­dial or pul­mo­nary ­hood for the main­te­nance of the ­exact cor­o­nary geom­etry ­because of the unfa­vor­able ­anatomy. In the ­remaining 2 ­patients, ­because of the deter­mi­na­tion of ­ischemic ­changes on the elec­tro­car­di­o­gram ­during the ­rewarming ­phase, we ­should ­revise the cor­o­nary anas­tom­osis by a per­i­car­dial ­hood.
­Results. One ­patient ­with intra­mural ­course of the cor­o­nary ­arteries ­died ­from of myo­car­dial ­ischemia. In the ­remaining 39 ­patients, we did not see post­op­er­a­tive mor­bidity and mor­tality ­because of the myo­car­dial ­ischemia.
Con­clu­sion. The use of per­i­car­dial or pul­mo­nary ­hood aug­men­ta­tion tech­niques is ­very ­helpful for the main­te­nance of the ­exact cor­o­nary geom­etry. Recon­struc­tion of the neo­aorta ­prior to cor­o­nary anas­tom­osis ­allows a ­more accu­rate deter­mi­na­tion of the ­true cor­o­nary implan­ta­tion ­points; espe­cially, if ­there is an ­abnormal rela­tion­ship and ­size mis­match ­between the ­great ves­sels. By ­this inno­va­tive tech­nique, the ­more accu­rate geom­etry and angu­la­tion of the cor­o­nary ­arteries can be ­achieved.

top of page