![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Share |


YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
TECHNICAL NOTES CARDIAC PAPERS
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2001 April;42(2):213-5
Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Comparison of internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation techniques: subpectoral position
Hall T. S.
From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
Background. To compare surgical techniques for subpectoral implantation of internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
Methods. Sequential comparison with review of the literature. Setting: University Hospital. Participants: the patients requiring ICD. Interventions: ICD insertions and device testing. Measurements: defibrillation and pacing thresholds, defibrillator lead impedance, operative time, and proximity of generator site to midline, clinical outcomes.
Results. Comparable efficacy in defibrillation, surgical time and medial placement. No wound infections, seromas or lead dislodgments. Preservation of pectoral muscle integrity.
Conclusions. Lateral single incision subpectoral ICD generator placement can be applied consistently with good results.