Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2001 April;42(2) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2001 April;42(2):213-5

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

TECHNICAL NOTES  CARDIAC PAPERS 

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2001 April;42(2):213-5

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Comparison of internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation techniques: subpectoral position

Hall T. S.

From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA


PDF


Back­ground. To com­pare sur­gical tech­niques for sub­pec­toral implan­ta­tion of ­internal car­di­o­verter defib­ril­lator (ICD).
­Methods. Sequen­tial com­par­ison ­with ­review of the lit­er­a­ture. Set­ting: Uni­ver­sity Hos­pital. Par­tic­i­pants: the ­patients ­requiring ICD. Inter­ven­tions: ICD inser­tions and ­device ­testing. Meas­ure­ments: defib­ril­la­tion and ­pacing thresh­olds, defib­ril­lator ­lead impe­dance, oper­a­tive ­time, and prox­imity of gen­er­ator ­site to mid­line, clin­ical out­comes.
­Results. Com­par­able effi­cacy in defib­ril­la­tion, sur­gical ­time and ­medial place­ment. No ­wound infec­tions, ser­omas or ­lead dis­lodg­ments. Pres­er­va­tion of pec­toral ­muscle integ­rity.
Con­clu­sions. Lat­eral ­single inci­sion sub­pec­toral ICD gen­er­ator place­ment can be ­applied con­sis­tently ­with ­good ­results.

top of page