Home > Journals > Otorhinolaryngology > Past Issues > Otorinolaringologia 2018 June;68(2) > Otorinolaringologia 2018 June;68(2):51-7

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe PROMO
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Otorinolaringologia 2018 June;68(2):51-7

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-6621.17.02140-3

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Multidisciplinary management of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Carmine F. GERVASIO 1, Giovanni GERBINO 2, Giuseppe RIVA 1 , Eleonora SCHELLINO 2, Alessandro CICOLIN 3, Federico CARANZANO 1, Francesca FRIGIOLINI 1, Pamela GIORDANO 1, Simona DEFILIPPI 1, Elena PIUMETTO 4, Giancarlo PECORARI 1, Roberto ALBERA 1

1 Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 2 Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 3 Sleep Disorder Center, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 4 Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Sant’Annunziata Hospital, Savigliano, Cuneo, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common disorder. Despite innovation in diagnostic tools and therapeutic options, a significant proportion of failures still remains. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent a multidisciplinary board evaluation at our Division. Moreover, we analyzed the impact of this approach to OSAS on the success rate of surgical procedures and oral appliances.
METHODS: Between June 2010 and May 2015, 893 patients with OSAS were evaluated at our Department. All the patients underwent a complete physical examination and fiberoptic pharyngolaryngoscopy with Müller test. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) was suggested for patients who refused or failed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Then, the patients underwent an evaluation by a multidisciplinary board to identify the best treatment. Surgical procedures and mandibular advancement devices (MAD) were the main options proposed to the patients.
RESULTS: DISE was performed in 133 cases and 119 of them (89.5%) were evaluated by the multidisciplinary team, consisting of a neurologist, an otolaryngologist, a maxillofacial surgeon and a orthodontist. Success rate was 74.2% for otorhinolaryngological procedures, 91.7% for maxillofacial procedures, and 66.7% for combined ones. Thus, success rate for surgical treatment was 78.3%, while oral appliances had a 93.3% of success. The global success rate was 82.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: DISE and multidisciplinary board evaluation allow to achieve a patient-tailored treatment with an high success rate. They should be introduced in routine daily practice for patients with OSAS who failed or refused ventilatory therapy.


KEY WORDS: Sleep apnea, obstructive - Endoscopy - Surgery

top of page