Home > Journals > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology > Past Issues > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology 2021 August;156(4) > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology 2021 August;156(4):460-6

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe PROMO
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Freefree

Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology 2021 August;156(4):460-6

DOI: 10.23736/S2784-8671.19.06402-2

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Melanoma survival with Classification and Regression Trees Analysis: a complement for the communication of prognosis to patients

Silvia MANCINI 1, Emanuele CROCETTI 1, Lauro BUCCHI 1, Nicola PIMPINELLI 2, Rosa VATTIATO 1, Orietta GIULIANI 1, Alessandra RAVAIOLI 1, Flavia BALDACCHINI 1 , Chiara BALDUCCI 1, Ignazio STANGANELLI 3, 4, Fabio FALCINI 1, 5

1 Romagna Cancer Registry, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy; 2 Unit of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence Medical School, Florence, Italy; 3 Unit of Skin Cancer, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy; 4 University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 5 Romagna Local Health Authority, Forlì, Forlì-Cesena, Italy



BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors in cutaneous melanoma are commonly evaluated by the Cox proportional hazard model. However, the interpretation of the effect of multiple variables is not straightforward. Classification and Regression Trees Analysis (CART), which allows a more friendly data evaluation, could be a valid integration of the message from Cox model.
METHODS: The CART algorithm splits up data, creating a “tree” of groups of patients with different profiles for the risk of death. Results are easy to interpret in clinical practice. A total of 2692 patients with invasive cutaneous melanoma registered in Romagna (northern Italy) between 1993-2012 and followed-up until the end of 2013 were included. The Cox model and CART analysis were applied to sex, patient age, histological subtype, Breslow’s tumor thickness, ulceration, site of disease, and Clark level.
RESULTS: The CART analysis identified 15 categories which were collapsed into five classes with statistically different survival. The best prognostic group (10-year observed survival, 99.1%) included subjects with Breslow thickness ≤0.78 mm and age 16-81 years. The worst prognostic group (10-year observed survival, 35.8%) comprised subjects with thickness ≥3.75 mm and age 16-96 years. According to the Cox model, patient age, histological subtype, Breslow thickness, ulceration, and site of disease had a significant independent prognostic value.
CONCLUSIONS: CART and Cox models provided consistent results. CART seemed friendlier in its interpretation and it could facilitate the communication of risk.


KEY WORDS: Survival analysis; Prognosis; Melanoma

top of page