Home > Journals > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology > Past Issues > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2020 August;155(4) > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2020 August;155(4):492-9

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2020 August;155(4):492-9

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-0488.18.05499-8

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Efficacy of a cosmetic phyto-caffeine shampoo in female androgenetic alopecia

Carolina BUSSOLETTI 1, Maria V. TOLAINI 2, Leonardo CELLENO 1

1 Research Center for Biotechnology Applied to Cosmetology, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy; 2 Product Testing Department, Eurofins Biopharma, Rome, Italy



BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common type of hair loss in both males as well as females, occurring in up to 57% of women by the age of 80 years. Androgenetic alopecia is associated with a high psychological burden and often results in substantially reduced quality of life, poor body image and low self-esteem, particularly in women. Caffeine-based products have shown promise, both in vitro and in vivo, as potential treatments for AGA. This study was performed to determine the efficacy of a phyto-caffeine-containing shampoo used over a 6-month period in female subjects with AGA.
METHODS: This was a single-center, double-blind parallel trial in which female subjects with AGA were randomized to either a phyto-caffeine-containing shampoo or a control shampoo. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the number of hairs pulled in a hair pull test at 6 months. Hair loss intensity, hair strength, subject satisfaction and tolerability were also assessed.
RESULTS: Subjects using the phyto-caffeine-containing shampoo had significantly fewer hairs pulled in a hair pull test at 6 months, compared with subjects using the control shampoo (-3.1 vs. -0.5 hairs; P<0.001). The majority of pre-specified secondary endpoints were also significantly improved for subjects using the phyto-caffeine-containing shampoo, compared with controls. Both products were very well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a control shampoo, a phyto-caffeine-containing shampoo was more efficacious, with respect to the number of hairs being pulled out at 6 months, hair loss intensity and hair strength in subjects with AGA.


KEY WORDS: Alopecia; Caffeine; Phytotherapy

top of page