Ricerca avanzata

Home > Riviste > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery > Fascicoli precedenti > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2005 Marzo;12(1) > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2005 Marzo;12(1):17-22



Rivista di Chirurgia Vascolare ed Endovascolare

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, Scopus

Periodicità: Trimestrale

ISSN 1824-4777

Online ISSN 1827-1847


Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2005 Marzo;12(1):17-22


Surgical and endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysms

Costantini A., Bonalumi F., Domanin M., Molinari A., Belletti S., Romagnoli S., Agrigoglio G.

Institute of Vascular Surgery and Angiology University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Aim. Personal experience with surgical and endovascular repair of aortic and iliac anastomotic pseudoaneurysms is described.
Methods. Between January 1991 and December 2002, 28 aortic or iliac anastomotic pseudoaneurysms were treated in 27 patients; 18 patients (66.7%) underwent standard surgical repair of an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm, one of them due to an aortoenteric fistula. A further 10 anastomotic pseudoaneurysms (6 aortic, 4 iliac) in 9 patients (33.3%) were treated by endovascular graft exclusion.
Results. The early total technical success rate was 89.3%; 88.9 % in the open repair group and 90% in the endovascular repair group with a postoperative mortality rate of 11.1% and 10%, respectively. In the surgical repair group, 4 patients were lost to follow-up, and there were 2 deaths unrelated to the procedure. In the remaining 10 patients, there was only 1 recurrent aortic distal anastomotic pseudoaneurysm (mean follow-up: 6.6 years).
In the endovascular repair group, there were 2 open repair conversions and 2 unrelated deaths. In the remaining 5 patients the pseudoaneurysms were successfully excluded with stent-grafts at a mean follow-up of 3.4 years.
Conclusion. The treatment of aortoiliac anastomotic pseudoaneurysms is advocated only in cases of expanding aneurysms or those with a diameter ≥ 5 cm, given the generally high operative morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair which is technically feasible and provides a high rate of lesion exclusion, appears to be a good alternative to standard surgical repair in selected cases.

lingua: Inglese


inizio pagina