Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 April;57(4) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 April;57(4):426-33

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Per citare questo articolo

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

Rivista di Medicina, Traumatologia e Psicologia dello Sport


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE


The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 April;57(4):426-33

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06177-X

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Accuracy of piezoelectric pedometer and accelerometer step counts

Joana CRUZ 1, 2, Dina BROOKS 3, Alda MARQUES 1, 2

1 Lab 3R, Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Aveiro, Portugal; 2 Institute of Research in Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal; 3 Rehabilitation Science Institute and Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada


PDF  


BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess step-count accuracy of a piezoeletric pedometer (Yamax PW/EX-510), when worn at different body parts, and a triaxial accelerometer (GT3X+), and to compare device accuracy; and identify the preferred location(s) to wear a pedometer.
METHODS: Sixty-three healthy adults (45.8±20.6 years old) wore 7 pedometers (neck, lateral right and left of the waist, front right and left of the waist, front pockets of the trousers) and 1 accelerometer (over the right hip), while walking 120 m at slow, self-preferred/normal and fast paces. Steps were recorded. Participants identified their preferred location(s) to wear the pedometer. Absolute percent error (APE) and Bland and Altman (BA) method were used to assess device accuracy (criterion measure: manual counts) and BA method for device comparisons.
RESULTS: Pedometer APE was below 3% at normal and fast paces despite wearing location, but higher at slow pace (4.5-9.1%). Pedometers were more accurate at the front waist and inside the pockets. Accelerometer APE was higher than pedometer APE (P<0.05); nevertheless, limits of agreement between devices were relatively small. Preferred wearing locations were inside the front right (N.=25) and left (N.=20) pockets of the trousers.
CONCLUSIONS: Yamax PW/EX-510 pedometers may be preferable than GT3X+ accelerometers to count steps, as they provide more accurate results. These pedometers should be worn at the front right or left positions of the waist or inside the front pockets of the trousers.


KEY WORDS: Actigraphy - Dimensional measurement accuracy - Exercise - Walking

inizio pagina

Publication History

Issue published online: February 21, 2017
Article first published online: January 21, 2016
Manuscript accepted: January 15, 2016
Manuscript revised: December 22, 2015
Manuscript received: September 24, 2015

Per citare questo articolo

Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A. Accuracy of piezoelectric pedometer and accelerometer step counts. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2017;57:426-33. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06177-X

Corresponding author e-mail

amarques@ua.pt