Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 October;56(10) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 October;56(10):1179-87

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Per citare questo articolo

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

Rivista di Medicina, Traumatologia e Psicologia dello Sport


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  SPORT INJURIES, REHABILITATION


The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 October;56(10):1179-87

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Ultrasonography for meniscal injuries in knee joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiao P. XIA 1, Hong L. CHEN 2, Bin ZHOU 1

1 Department of Orthopedics, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Nantong City, Nantong, China; 2 Nantong University, Nantong, China


PDF  


INTRODUCTION: The aim of the paper is to systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for meniscal injuries in knee joint.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search of PubMed and Web of Science was performed up to January 2015. Only studies for diagnosis meniscal injuries by ultrasonography were included. The results were meta-analyzed by pooling estimates of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and constructing the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-one studies met the selection criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) of ultrasonography diagnosis were 0.775 (95% CI: 0.747-0.801), 0.838 (95% CI: 0.818-0.857), and 0.9107 (95% CI: 0.8625-0.9589), respectively. For lateral meniscus diagnosis and medial meniscus diagnosis, the AUC was 0.9812 (95% CI: 0.9592-1.000) and 0.8997 (95% CI: 0.7313-1.000), respectively. However, in diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the AUC was 0.9421 (95% CI: 0.8760-1.000). The ultrasonography inter-observer agreement resulted in a moderate reliability, with the κ value ranged from 0.381 to 0.482.
CONCLUSIONS: We found the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for meniscal injuries was good. No evidence showed MRI had better accuracy than ultrasonography diagnosis. We recommend ultrasonography should be routinely used for evaluation of meniscal injuries in knee joint.

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Xia XP, Chen HL, Zhou B. Ultrasonography for meniscal injuries in knee joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2016 October;56(10):1179-87. 

Corresponding author e-mail

pphss@126.com