N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,111
Online ISSN 1827-1928
EXCERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS
Zemkova E., Hamar D.
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
Aim: The study compares the power outputs in concentric phase of chest presses and squats performed without and with countermovement on stable and unstable support surface, respectively.
Methods: A group of 16 physical education students performed randomly in four different days 3 repetitions of: 1) barbell chest presses on the bench and Swiss ball, respectively, and 2) barbell squats on stable support base and Bosu ball, respectively. Exercises were performed without and with countermovement (CM) using maximal effort in concentric phase of lifting. Initial weight of 20 kg increased by 10 kg or 5 kg (at higher loads) up to at least 85% of previously established 1RM under stable conditions. A PC based system FiTRO Dyne Premium was used to monitor force and velocity and to calculate power. As a parameter of the capability to use elastic energy was considered the difference in mean power in concentric phase of weight exercises (ΔP) performed with and without CM.
Results: There were higher power outputs in concentric phase of CM chest presses as compared to those performed from quiet position on the chest under both stable and unstable conditions. This enhancement of power due to CM was rather modest at lower weights and become more pronounced with increasing weights reaching a maximum at 57.1% 1RM on stable and at 47.6% 1RM on unstable support surface. Lifting heavier weights not only failed to increase the enhancing effect but led to its decline. Similar trend was observed during squats with maximal enhancement of power in concentric phase of lifting at about 80% 1RM under both conditions. The ΔP was significantly lower during chest presses on Swiss ball than on the bench, however, only at higher weights lifted (≥60% 1RM). On the other hand, the ΔP during squats performed on Bosu ball and on stable support base did not differ significantly across all weights lifted.
Conclusion: The ability to utilize elastic energy during CM chest presses is more profoundly compromised under unstable than stable conditions, namely at higher weights lifted. On the other hand, there is similar enhancement of power in concentric phase of CM squats on stable and unstable support surface regardless of weights lifted. Besides the type of exercise, this may be ascribed to different degree of instability of devices used (Swiss ball vs. Bosu ball).