Home > Riviste > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2007 September;47(3) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2007 September;47(3):300-3

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

Rivista di Medicina, Traumatologia e Psicologia dello Sport


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,111


eTOC

 

Original articles  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS


The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2007 September;47(3):300-3

lingua: Inglese

A new valid and reliable windtrainer V.O2max protocol

Dalziel W. M., Hannan S. M., Watts M. C., Coombes J. S.

School of Human Movement Studies The University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia


PDF  


Aim. Maximal oxygen uptake (V.O2max) cycling protocols usually require expensive laboratory ergometers where the athlete is unaccustomed to the cycling position. Recently, we developed a V.O2max speed-ramped protocol with an indoor cycling simulator (Cateye Windtrainer WT) allowing cyclists to use their own bicycles during the V.O2max test. The aim of this study was to test the validity of the WT protocol by comparing it with a traditional (TD) resistance-ramped protocol using an electronically braked ergometer. In addition, the retest reliability of the WT protocol was also determined.
Methods. Twenty experienced cyclists randomly completed 6 V.O2max protocols consisting of one familiarization trial and two tests on the WT and TD protocols.
Results. There were minimal differences in maximal oxygen uptake values between protocols (WT 64.1±7.1, TD 63.3±7.4 mL/kg/min). The variability in the difference of the means between the two protocols was 0.8 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval CI: -0.26-2.02), the coefficient of variation (CV) was 2.8% (95%CI: 2.2-4.2%) and the interclass correlation was r=0.94 (P<0.01; 95%CI: 0.86-0.98). The intratest difference within the WT protocol was 1.5% (95%CI: -1.9-5%), CV=5.3% (95%CI: 4.1-8%) and the retest correlation was r=0.81 (P<0.01; 95%CI: 0.57-0.92).
Conclusion. The WT speed-ramped protocol is a valid and reliable method to assess V.O2max.

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Corresponding author e-mail