Home > Riviste > Panminerva Medica > Fascicoli precedenti > Panminerva Medica 2008 June;50(2) > Panminerva Medica 2008 June;50(2):153-9

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti

PANMINERVA MEDICA

Rivista di Medicina Interna


Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,698


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  update on CARDIOLOGICAL ISSUESFREEfree


Panminerva Medica 2008 June;50(2):153-9

Copyright © 2008 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Carotid artery stenting 2008

Van Laanen J., Hendriks J. M., Van Sambeek M. R. H. M.

Department of Vascular Surgery Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands


FULL TEXT  


In an effort to minimize interventions, in the last decade carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been suggested as an alternative to surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic extra cranial obstructive disease. CAS is relatively new compared to CEA and it should be acknowledged that CAS is an evolving technique. As technology has improved, procedural risks have declined and are approaching those reported for CEA. From the individual randomised clinical trial it can be concluded that in patients at high risk for CEA, CAS is an equivalent, maybe better alternative. In symptomatic patients at standard risk for CEA, CAS has not proven non-inferior, and is worse when performed by relatively inexperienced operators without embolic protection device compared to highly experienced CEA surgeons.

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Corresponding author e-mail