Home > Riviste > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Fascicoli precedenti > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2012 June;56(2) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2012 June;56(2):97-103

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES

Rivista di Neurochirurgia


Indexed/Abstracted in: e-psyche, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Neuroscience Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,651


eTOC

 

  SPINE SURGERY - PART II


Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2012 June;56(2):97-103

lingua: Inglese

Minimal access to the posterolateral lumbar spine

Hnenny L. 1, Fourney D. R. 2

1 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada;
2 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada


PDF  


The purported advantages of minimally invasive spine surgery over open microsurgical alternatives for lumbar decompression and fusion are attractive to patients, surgeons, and hospital administrators. Shorter hospital length of stay, less blood loss, shorter operating times, decreased use of postoperative narcotic analgesics, and a more rapid return to work have all been touted as advantages. In this review, we describe step-by-step techniques for minimal access posterolateral lumbar decompression and fusion. Key learning tasks for the introduction of each technique into practice are highlighted. The current quality of evidence for each approach is also critically evaluated.

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Corresponding author e-mail

daryl.fourney@usask.ca