Home > Riviste > Minerva Chirurgica > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > Minerva Chirurgica 2017 Jun 16

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Per citare questo articolo

MINERVA CHIRURGICA

Rivista di Chirurgia


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,115


eTOC

 

Minerva Chirurgica 2017 Jun 16

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07412-0

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an analysis of early versus delayed cholecystectomy and predictive factors for conversion

Joel C., GOH 1, Jarrod K. TAN 2, Janice W. LIM 1, Iyer G, SHRIDHAR 2, Krishnakumar MADHAVAN 2, Alfred W. KOW 2

1 Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; 2 Division of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, National University Health System Singapore, Singapore


PDF  


BACKGROUND: There is an increasing preference for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) as compared to delayed LC (DLC) in the management of acute cholecystitis (AC). Conversion to open cholecystectomy (LOC) remains an important outcome. We aim to compare ELC and DLC outcomes and identify LOC predictors.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 466 patients who underwent LC for AC from June 2010 - June 2015 was performed. Patients were divided into ELC and DLC groups, defined as LC performed within 7 days and between 4 to 24 weeks of symptom onset respectively. Peri-operative outcomes and predictors for LOC were analyzed.
RESULTS: Conversion rates were comparable [ELC, 8.6% vs DLC, 8.0%] (p=0.867). While median operative time was longer in ELC [101.5 mins (83.0-130.1)] than DLC [88.0 mins (62.3-118.8)] (p<0.001), intra-operative [ELC, 1.9% vs DLC, 3.0%] (p=0.541) and post-operative morbidity [ELC, 13.5% vs DLC, 12.5%] (p=0.688) was comparable. Median total length of stay (LOS) was shorter in ELC [4 days (3-6)] than DLC [5 days (4-9)] (p<0.001). Univariate analysis showed increased age [LC, 57 (45-66) vs LOC, 60 (56-72)] (p=0.016), presence of comorbidities [LC, 69.0% vs LOC, 87.8%] (p=0.009), previous abdominal surgery (LC, 6.1% vs LOC, 17.1%) (p=0.014), fever (p=0.001), Murphy’s sign (p=0.005) and lower albumin [LC, 42.0 (39.0-45.0) vs LOC, 40.0 (36.0-43.0)] (p=0.003) to be predictors for LOC.
CONCLUSIONS: ELC provides shorter LOS and eliminates the risk of gallstone-related morbidity while awaiting surgery. It should be advocated for patients with AC. The presence of comorbidities, increased age, previous abdominal surgery and low albumin are predictors for conversion.


KEY WORDS: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Acute cholecystitis

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Goh JC, Tan JK, Lim JW, Shridhar IG, Madhavan K, Kow AW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an analysis of early versus delayed cholecystectomy and predictive factors for conversion. Minerva Chir 2017 Jun 16. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07412-0

Corresponding author e-mail

alfred_kow@nuhs.edu.sg