Home > Riviste > Minerva Anestesiologica > Fascicoli precedenti > Articles online first > Minerva Anestesiologica 2017 Mar 08

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti

MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

Rivista di Anestesia, Rianimazione, Terapia Antalgica e Terapia Intensiva


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036


eTOC

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 2017 Mar 08

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11524-5

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Low flow veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure

Matthias P. HILTY 1 , Thomas RIVA 1, 2, Silvia R. COTTINI 3, Eva-Maria KLEINERT 1, Alessandra MAGGIORINI 1, Marco MAGGIORINI 1

1 Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 2 Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Berne, Berne, Switzerland; 3 Surgical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland


PDF  


BACKGROUND: Ventilation with low tidal volume and airway pressure results in a survival benefit in ARDS patients. Previous research suggests that avoiding mechanical ventilation altogether may be beneficial in some cases of respiratory failure. Our hypothesis was that low flow veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) enables maintenance of a lung protective ventilation strategy or awake spontaneous ventilation despite severe hypercapnic respiratory failure (HRF).
METHODS: Twenty patients with HRF were investigated while mechanically ventilated (n=14) or breathing spontaneously close to respiratory exhaustion (n=6). Low flow ECCO2R was performed using a hemoperfusion device with a polypropylene gas-exchanger.
RESULTS: Causes of HRF were severe ARDS (n=11), COPD (n=4), chronic lung transplant rejection (n=3) and cystic fibrosis (n=2). During the first 8h of ECCO2R, PaCO2 decreased from 10.6(9.3-12.9) to 7.9(7.3-9.3)kPa (p<0.001) and pH increased from 7.23(7.09-7.40) to 7.36(7.27-7.41) (p<0.05). Thereafter, steady state was achieved while maintaining lung protective tidal volume (4.7(3.8- 6.5)ml/kg) and peak ventilator pressure (28(27-30)mbar at 24h). During the first 48h, thrombocyte count decreased by 52%(p<0.01), Fibrinogen by 38%(p<0.05). Intubation could be avoided in all spontaneously breathing patients. In 4/6 high blood flow extracorporeal circulation was required due to increased oxygen demand. 6/14 mechanically ventilated patients recovered from respiratory support.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in mechanically ventilated patients with HRF, low flow ECCO2R supports the maintenance of lung protective tidal volume and peak ventilator pressure. In selected awake patients with acute HRF, it may be a novel treatment approach to avoid mechanical ventilation, hence preventing ventilator- and sedation-associated morbidity and mortality.


KEY WORDS: Extracorporeal CO2 removal - Respiratory failure - Extracorporeal circulation - Lung protective ventilation - Hypercapnia

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Corresponding author e-mail

matthias.hilty@usz.ch