N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
Official Journal of the , the International Union of Phlebology and the
Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,899
Online ISSN 1827-1839
Syed D. 1, Iqbal O. 1, 2, Mosier M. 3, Mitchell R. 4, Hoppensteadt D. 1, Bouchard C. 2, Fareed J. 1, Gamelli R. 3
1 Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA;
2 Department of Ophtalmology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA;
3 Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA;
4 Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the levels of endocan and other biomarkers of inflammation in the systemic circulation of three groups of patients: 1) biopsy confirmed Stevens Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS/TEN) subjects; 2) patients with allergic skin reactions but biopsy negative for SJS/TEN; and 3) normal controls. Besides, this paper aims to investigate the association of endocan levels with the extent of the skin lesions, the presence of purpura, and the degree of acute renal insufficiency, as well as to investigate endocan as a marker of clinical severity by correlating endocan levels with the SCORTEN results (a prognositic score for SJS/TEN).
METHODS: Sixteen patients over the age of 18 years who were referred to Loyola University Medical Center with severe allergic skin reactions were recruited over a two-year period from May 2012 to May 2014. A diagnosis of SJS or TEN was confirmed in 7 subjects by skin biopsy. Citrated plasma samples were assayed for endocan, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The differences between SJS/TEN subjects, biopsy negative subjects, and normal controls (N.=23) were explored using ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Associations with other clinical variables were identified using linear and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Biopsy positive SJS/TEN subjects and biopsy negative subjects had higher endocan levels than normal controls (SJS/TEN: 3.01 ng/mL [IQR: 2.15-8.11]; biopsy negative: 3.96 ng/mL [IQR: 1.54-4.85]; normal controls: 1.79 ng/mL [IQR: 1.67-1.98]; ANOVA P=0.0038). Endocan levels were more strongly associated with SCORTEN in SJS/TEN subjects than in biopsy negative subjects (R2 SJS/TEN=0.5110; biopsy negative=0.0317). SJS/TEN subjects exhibited significantly higher levels of TNF-α compared to normal controls (P=0.0267). The TNF-α levels were significantly lower compared to biopsy negative subjects (P=0.0052). VEGF levels were also elevated among SJS/TEN and biopsy negative subjects compared to normal controls (SJS/TEN: 12.04 pg/mL: [IQR: 7.64-52.7]; biopsy negative: 10.54 pg/mL [IQR: 4.17-6.46]; normal controls: 4.94 pg/mL [IQR: 4.17-6.46]; ANOVA P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in VEGF levels between SJS/TEN and biopsy negative subjects (P=0.7110). Similarly, CRP levels were elevated among SJS/TEN patients and biopsy negative subjects compared to normal controls (SJS/TEN: 32.09 µg/mL [IQR: 31.49-52.08]; biopsy negative: 83.38 µg/mL [IQR: 44.74-145.38]; healthy normal: 1.08 µg/mL [IQR: 0.73-2.03]; ANOVA P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in CRP levels between SJS/TEN and biopsy negative subjects (P=0.2416).
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate enodcan, a marker of endothelial dysfunction, in the systemic circulation of SJS/TEN patients. Elevated endocan levels were more strongly associated with disease severity among SJS/TEN subjects than among less severe allergic reactions with skin involvement.