Ricerca avanzata

Home > Riviste > International Angiology > Fascicoli precedenti > International Angiology 2011 Giugno;30(3) > International Angiology 2011 Giugno;30(3):199-211



Rivista di Angiologia

Official Journal of the International Union of Angiology, the International Union of Phlebology and the Central European Vascular Forum
Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,899

Periodicità: Bimestrale

ISSN 0392-9590

Online ISSN 1827-1839


International Angiology 2011 Giugno;30(3):199-211


Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism: low molecular weight heparin compared to the selective anticoagulants rivaroxaban, dabigatran and fondaparinux

Welzel D. 1, Hull R. 2, Fareed J. 3

1 Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany;
2 Foothill Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada;
3 Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Laboratories, Loyola University Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA

Newer therapeutic options available in the prevention of postoperative thromboembolism, currently focused on fondaparinux, rivaroxaban and dabigatran warrant an overall therapeutic assessment. The constitutive comparisons with enoxaparin are based on a combined outcome measure solely driven by the incidence of “asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis”. Its validity as a clinically relevant endpoint is missing if antithrombotics of different classes are compared. This is because they target different phases of thrombogenesis i. e. ahead and beyond the asymptomatic stage of thrombosis. Additional concerns refer to the dosing-regimens and their practical administration: Fondaparinux, rivaroxaban and dabigatran are dosed to achieve maximum effects very close to their limits of tolerance whereas wide dosing spectra for the low molecular weight herparin (LMWH)’s indicate the potential for dose adaptation and increase. The other disadvantage to the control-heparin originates in the timing for the 1st administration which does’nt fit in with the “just-in-time” principle. So the enoxaparin-regimen is lacking in benchmark-quality – with the consequence that the meaning of the Phase III-trials does’nt go beyond a mere technical demarcation from the marketed variant of the product as defined by the stipulations in the package insert. As to tolerance the selective anticoagulants exhibit an increased risk of major and other clinically relevant bleeding, exceeding that of enoxaparin by 30% (P<0.001). The outcome of the meta-analyses on fondaparinux, rivaroxaban and dabigatran is supported by product-specific calculations and assessments of the European Medicine Equivalence Agency (EMEA). Rivaroxaban and dabigatran show significant age-dependent renal accumulation. Because the dose-finding studies were restricted to patients over 60 year old the regimens definitely established are not applicable to younger patients. The reason for the limited therapeutic index of the selective anticoagulants originates in their monovalent activity as such not adequately matching the complexity of thrombogenesis and early thrombus extension. Their class-specific limitations are compensated through more intensive dosage-regimens which result in accentuated bleeding complications. Connotatively the hypothesis emerged that antiXa- and IIa-effects interact synergistically which translates into enhanced efficacy and tolerance. Experimental studies on hirudin with pentasaccharide and hirudin with “lower low molecular weight heparin” (3KDA) support such rationale.

lingua: Inglese


inizio pagina