N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
Official Journal of the , , , ,
In association with
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,063
Online ISSN 1973-9095
Palieri G. 1, Vetrano M. 1,2, Mangone M. 1,3, Cereti M. 1, Bemporad J. 1, Roselli G. 1, D’Arrigo C. 2, Speranza A. 2, Vulpiani M. C. 2, Ferretti A. 2
1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, ACISMOM, Rome, Italy;
2 Orthopedic Unit and Kirk Kilgour Sports Injury Center, “La Sapienza” University School of Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy;
3 Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Science, “Sapienza” University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
AIM: Different surgical approaches are used in total hip arthroplasty. The present study confronted two surgical techniques, analysing functional recovery in terms of activities of daily living, and ambulation using gait analysis, after a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Our hypothesis was that the increased surgical damage could modify the gait pattern and functional recovery.
METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly assigned to two homogeneous groups: Group A was treated with intermuscular minimally invasive surgery (MIS); Group B was treated with standard lateral transmuscular approach. Follow up was planned at 30 and 90 days. Instrumental evaluation using gait analysis and functional evaluation using validated scales were performed at follow up.
RESULTS: No differences could be found as for functional scales. At the first follow up, the MIS approach proved to be the most favourable: data showed a longer duration of the swing phase, an improved range of motion of the non-treated hip, a reduced adduction (all P<0.005) and a correct timing of activation of the gluteus medium muscle on the treated side. At the second evaluation, gait analysis demonstrated some benefits of the intermuscular approach (a better flexion of both hips, and a minor obliquity of the pelvis during the terminal stance), but also advantages in the transmuscular group (better hip extension).
CONCLUSION: Gait pattern after THA seems to be strictly dependent on surgical access and on the extent and location of surgical damage. It appears important to consider these elements in order to correctly manage the rehabilitation treatment after surgery.