Home > Riviste > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2009 Agosto;50(4) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2009 Agosto;50(4):545-53





Rivista di Chirurgia Cardiaca, Vascolare e Toracica

Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,632




The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2009 Agosto;50(4):545-53

lingua: Inglese

Histopathological comparison of vascular wall damage created by external cross-clamp and endoluminal balloon occlusion techniques

Ozalp B. 1, Canbaz S. 1, Huseyinova G. 2, Duran E. 1

1 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Faculty of Medicine Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
2 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey


Aim. Almost all cross-clamps utilized in vascular surgery, even atraumatic clamps, have been shown to cause mechanical damage to the vascular wall. In recent years, surgical procedures using an endoluminal balloon technique have been reported as an alternative occlusion strategy. This study discusses the histopathological characteristics and comparison between vascular wall damage secondary to the two occlusion techniques in the early postoperative period.
Methods. Twelve adult rabbits were divided into two experimental groups: the clamp group (N.=6) and the balloon group (N.=6). External cross-clamp occlusion was applied to the abdominal aorta for 30 minutes via laparotomy in the clamp group. In the balloon group, occlusion was applied for 30 minutes by inflating the catheter balloon, which was inserted through the iliac artery and advanced into the abdominal aorta. The appropriate aortic segments were subsequently extracted in both groups and tissue samples were examined by light and electron microscopy. Finally, the samples were scored for grade of tissue damage.
Results. In both experimental groups, tissue damage was apparent. In the investigations carried out under light microscopy, it was observed that the damage caused by balloon occlusion was remarkably less than the damage caused by the cross-clamp technique. In the balloon group, eight tissue samples (66.7%) had grade 1 damage. On the other hand, five tissue samples had grade 3 damage, all of which were in the clamp group. Investigation by electron microscopy revealed that greater intimal, medial, and adventitial damage occurred in the vascular walls of the clamp group samples, and this also corresponded with an increase in immune response and intraluminal thrombosis.
Conclusion. External clamp and internal balloon occlusion techniques applied to the aorta were compared, and widespread intimal and medial damage were observed in both techniques. However, endoluminal occlusion of the aorta should be the technique of choice in properly selected cases, since it results in lower damage grades, and it should also be used if application of an external clamp is technically difficult.

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Corresponding author e-mail