Home > Riviste > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Fascicoli precedenti > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 August;45(4) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 Auguste;45(4):321-33

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti

THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

Rivista di Chirurgia Cardiaca, Vascolare e Toracica


Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,179


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  ENDOVASCULAR SECTION - ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS: LATEST RESULTS


The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2004 Auguste;45(4):321-33

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Short- and long-term outcome following endovascular aneurysm repair. How does it compare to open surgery?

Zarins C. K., Heikkinen M. A., Lee E. S., Alsac J. M., Arko F. R.

Division of Vascular Surgery Stanford University, Medical Center Stanford, CA, USA


PDF  


The primary objective of aneurysm repair is to prevent aneurysm rupture while avoiding aneurysm-related death. This manuscript reviews the primary and secondary outcome measures following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in relation to similar outcome measures for open surgical repair. Both EVAR and open repair are effective in preventing aneurysm rupture, although late ruptures can occur with either treatment method. The late risk of rupture following EVAR is less that 1% per year using current endovascular devices. Aneurysm-related death rate appears to be lower following EVAR compared to open surgery, primarily due to a lower perioperative mortality rate. Actuarial 5-year survival after both endovascular and open aneurysm repair is approximately 70%. Perioperative outcome measures favor EVAR over open repair for patients with suitable anatomy with reduced morbidity and more rapid patient recovery. Short and long-term outcomes following endovascular repair compare favorably to open repair. However, prospective studies are needed to better define the long-term outcomes using comparable endpoints.

inizio pagina

Publication History

Per citare questo articolo

Corresponding author e-mail