Home > Journals > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery > Past Issues > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2007 March;14(1) > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2007 March;14(1):9-16

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY

A Journal on Vascular and Endovascular Surgery


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, Scopus


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  


Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2007 March;14(1):9-16

language: English

Carotid artery stentinG. A review

Cao P. G., De Rango P., Cieri E.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy


PDF  


Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid stenosis, yet there remains a substantial amount of variability and uncertainty in clinical practice in the referral of patients for stenting versus endarterectomy. By undertaking a review of the literature, messages were taken in order to better define benefit from carotid stenting versus endarterectomy. CAS may be favorably compared to CEA only in experienced hands and fully trained centers: the learning curve is longer than previously expected for this procedure. Not all symptomatic patients may undergo CAS with the same periprocedural risk: older patients and recently symptomatic patients may still benefit from CEA. Larger sample size is needed to clarify the risk-benefit ratio of CAS versus CEA especially in asymptomatic patients. Ongoing, correctly designed, large randomized trials will help determine optimal carotid revascularization strategies in the future.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail