Advanced Search

Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > Articles online first > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 May 24

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUETHE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

A Journal on Applied Physiology, Biomechanics, Preventive Medicine,
Sports Medicine and Traumatology, Sports Psychology

Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,111

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0022-4707

Online ISSN 1827-1928

 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 May 24

Agility and change of direction in soccer: differences according to the player ages

Giovanni FIORILLI 1, Michalis MITROTASIOS 2, Enzo IULIANO 1, Eugenio M. PISTONE 3, Giovanna AQUINO 1, Giuseppe CALCAGNO 1, Alessandra DI CAGNO 3

1 Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy; 2 Department of Motor and Health Sciences, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 3 Department of Motor, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, Italy

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the Changes of Direction Speed (CODS) and Reactive Agility (RA) in soccer players of different ages, in order to optimise the best training of these skills.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven players, divided into bi-annual age-groups, U12, U14, U16 and U18, performed two tests: Y-Agility Test, carried out in planned and reactive mode (Y-PLAN and Y-REAC) and Illinois for Change Of Direction Test (ICODT). Difference between Y-REAC minus Y-PLAN represents the index of reactivity (REAC-INDEX).
RESULTS: MANOVA showed significant differences among groups (F3,182=14.591; p<0.01; η2p =0.244). Y-PLAN showed significant differences only between U12 and the other groups (p<0.01). ICODT results were significantly different between the groups U12 and U14 and the other groups (p<0.01). Significant Pearson’s correlations between Y-TEST and ICODT, for the three categories of young players (0.398 p<0.05; 0.615 p<0.01; 0.608 p<0.01 respectively), were found, whereas no significant correlation was found in U18 group.
CONCLUSIONS: The best performance of Y-PLAN and ICODT, through age, depends on physical skill level, whereas the best RA results depend on technique and experience that help the players to use anticipatory skill. The high correlations between CODS and RA performances, differently than adult athletes, suggest that an effective work program for young players may include RA and CODS training at the same time.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page